• DOI:10.1006/anbe.2002.2032
• Corpus ID: 39966912

Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants

@article{Franks2003StrategiesFC,
  title={Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants},
  author={Nigel R. Franks and Eamonn B. Mallon and Helen E. Bray and Mathew J Hamilton and Thomas C Mischler},
  journal={Animal Behaviour},
  year={2003},
  volume={65},
  pages={215-223}
}

• N. Franks, E. Mallon, +2 authors Thomas C Mischler
• Published 31 January 2003
• Environmental Science
• Animal Behaviour

We tested the decision-making abilities of emigrating ant colonies. The colonies had to choose a new nest site when presented with two or more potential nest sites, each with different attributes or different combinations of attributes. For Leptothorax albipennis colonies in the laboratory, darkness of the nest cavity, internal height of the cavity and width of the entrance were all important attributes. The colonies ranked these attributes: darkness of the nest site was more important than internal cavity height, which in turn was more important than entrance width. These choices conform to the logic of transitivity. In addition, the colonies used a sophisticated decision-making strategy in which they took all alternatives and all attributes into consideration. Furthermore, the ants, in effect, weighed the different values of different attributes. They also chose the best nest when presented with only one excellent nest among four mediocre ones or one excellent nest in an array of one excellent, one good and one mediocre. Altogether, our results suggest that these ant colonies, in deciding upon a new home, used a weighted additive strategy, one of the most computationally expensive and thorough decision-making strategies. Copyright 2003 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.