Strange attractors in the Web of Science database

@article{GarcaPrez2011StrangeAI,
  title={Strange attractors in the Web of Science database},
  author={Miguel A. Garc{\'i}a-P{\'e}rez},
  journal={J. Informetrics},
  year={2011},
  volume={5},
  pages={214-218}
}
Accurate computation of h indices or other indicators of research impact requires access to databases supplying complete and accurate citation information. The Web of Science (WoS) database is widely used for this purpose and it is generally deemed error-free. This note describes an inaccuracy that seems to affect differentially non-English sources and targets in WoS, namely, “phantom citations” (i.e., papers reported by WoS to cite some article when they actually did not) and their… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.
7 Citations
26 References
Similar Papers

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 26 references

A comparative citationanalysis ofWebof Science , Scopus , andGoogle Scholar

  • M. Levine-Clark, E. L. Gil
  • Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship
  • 2009
1 Excerpt

A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university

  • E. S. Vieira, Gomes, F J.A.N.
  • Portal: Libraries and the Academia,
  • 2009

Consecuencias de los errores en las referencias bibliográficas

  • J. 161–169. Osca-Lluch, C. Civera Mollá, M. Peñaranda Ortega
  • El caso de la revista Psicothema. Psicothema,
  • 2009

Consecuencias de los errores en las referencias bibliográficas , El caso de la revista Psicothema

  • J. Osca-Lluch, C. CiveraMollá, M. PeñarandaOrtega
  • Psicothema
  • 2009

Google Scholar search performance : Comparative recall and precision

  • W. H. Walters
  • Portal : Libraries and the Academia
  • 2009
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…