Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients’ preferences matter

@article{Mulley2012StopTS,
  title={Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients’ preferences matter},
  author={Albert G. Mulley and Chris Trimble and Glyn Elwyn},
  journal={BMJ : British Medical Journal},
  year={2012},
  volume={345}
}
Correct treatment recommendations require accurate diagnosis not only of the medical condition but of patients’ treatment preferences. Al Mulley, Chris Trimble, and Glyn Elwyn outline how to ensure that preferences are not misdiagnosed 

Topics from this paper

Patient centred diagnosis: sharing diagnostic decisions with patients in clinical practice
TLDR
How uncertainty and stakes should shape the conversation is discussed, with a focus on shared decision making for diagnostic decisions.
Time for a “patient’s page” in hospital notes
TLDR
A conversation that includes the patient in the treating team may indeed help, but what matters most to him or her is wider than preference for treatment options.
Systematic review of shared decision‐making in surgery
TLDR
This review aimed to assess the extent to which SDM is applied during surgical consultations, and the metrics used to measure SDM and SDM‐related outcomes.
Setting a research agenda for medical overuse
TLDR
An agenda for coordinated research to improve the understanding of overuse in medicine is proposed and it is suggested that current efforts to understand the problem are inadequate.
Importance of clarifying patients’ desired role in shared decision making to match their level of engagement with their preferences
We should not assume that certain groups of patients don’t want to or can’t participate in decisions about their healthcare, say Mary Politi and colleagues, and they offer advice on how to determine
Diagnosis and treatment: Are psychiatrists choosing wisely?
TLDR
The problem of overuse and the launch of the Royal College of Psychiatrists' Choosing Wisely campaign is discussed, providing a critical review of why this might occur and whether Cho choosing Wisely is likely to be successful.
Decision aid and preference assessment of topical anesthesia for otolaryngology procedures
To determine preference patterns for topical anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopy pre‐coronavirus (2019 coronavirus disease [COVID‐19]) pandemic and analyze outcomes based on preference, using
When More Is Less: Overuse of Medical Services Harms Patients
TLDR
Patients and their families may be unaware that there can be such a thing as too much medicine and are in any case often unable to distinguish between care that is necessary and beneficial and procedures, tests, and treatments that are not.
Eliciting Preferences of Multimorbid Elderly Adults in Family Practice Using an Outcome Prioritization Tool
To explore an outcome prioritization tool (OPT) in eliciting individuals’ preferred health outcomes (remaining alive, maintaining independence, reducing pain, reducing other symptoms) in the context
A unified framework for joint patient-physician collaboration: The colorectal cancer screening problem
As patients have become more active in their medical decisions, healthcare providers have increasingly emphasized patient-centred care. To deliver such care, providers must respect patients’ needs ...
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
PATIENTS ’ PREFERENCES MATTER Stop the silent misdiagnosis
TLDR
The King's Fund seeks to understand how the health system in England can be improved and helps to shape policy, transform services and bring about behaviour change through research, analysis, leadership development and service improvement.
Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial.
TLDR
Providing women with information alone did not affect treatment choices; however, the addition of an interview to clarify values and elicit preferences had a significant effect on women's management and resulted in reduced costs.
Do Patients and Providers Agree About the Most Important Facts and Goals for Breast Reconstruction Decisions?
TLDR
Significant variability exists among patients and between patients and providers, with respect to the most important facts and goals to guide decision making about reconstruction.
NHS Atlas of Variation
The Department of Health Right Care Team have published their follow-up second Atlas (November 2011), greatly expanded and covering 71 indicators (including a range of diabetes indicators developed
The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial.
TLDR
An innovative decision aid effectively involved patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in decisions about their medications but did not improve adherence or HbA(1c) levels.
Securing Our Future Health: Taking a Long-Term View. The Health Service in 2022
TLDR
The Wanless Report concludes that in order to meet peopleâ?Ts expectations and to deliver the highest quality over the next 20 years, the UK will need to devote more resources to health care and that this must be matched by reform to ensure that these resources are used effectively.
Video decision support tool for advance care planning in dementia: randomised controlled trial
TLDR
Older people who view a video depiction of a patient with advanced dementia after hearing a verbal description of the condition are more likely to opt for comfort as their goal of care compared with those who solely listen to a verbal descriptions.
Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma.
TLDR
Negotiating patients' treatment decisions significantly improves adherence to asthma pharmacotherapy and clinical outcomes and results in significantly better clinical outcomes.
Equity and Excellence: liberating the NHS
TLDR
A continuum in women’s healthcare which may be significantly jeopardised by the potential fragmentation of commissioning is recommended and the opportunity to contribute to the leadership tasks inherent in the proposed reorganisation is welcomed.
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
TLDR
Tests indicate that decision aids improve knowledge and realistic expectations; enhance active participation in decision making; lower decisional conflict; decrease the proportion of people remaining undecided, and improve agreement between values and choice.
...
1
2
3
...