Stop Complaining! The Social Costs of Making Attributions to Discrimination

@article{Kaiser2001StopCT,
  title={Stop Complaining! The Social Costs of Making Attributions to Discrimination},
  author={Cheryl R. Kaiser and Carol T. Miller},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  year={2001},
  volume={27},
  pages={254 - 263}
}
Recent research indicates that stigmatized people may avoid claims of discrimination because such attributions are costly in terms of perceived control over outcomes and social self-esteem. The authors hypothesized that minimization of discrimination also occurs in part because negative social costs accompany attributions to discrimination. In Experiment 1, an African American who attributed a failing test grade to discrimination was perceived as a complainer and was less favorably evaluated in… Expand
When do the stigmatized make attributions to discrimination occurring to the self and others? The roles of self-presentation and need for control.
TLDR
Two experiments examined how the goals of self-presentation and maintenance of control over one's outcomes influence women's tendencies to make or to avoid making attributions to discrimination, and demonstrated that failing to view events as discrimination has negative psychological costs. Expand
Complaining about a compliment: Evaluating attributions of positive outcomes to discrimination: Attributing success to discrimination
People evaluate stigmatized group members negatively when they attribute negative personal outcomes to discrimination, even when discrimination is the likely cause. The present studies examinedExpand
Derogating the Victim: The Interpersonal Consequences of Blaming Events on Discrimination
This experiment examines whether African Americans who attribute negative events to discrimination incur interpersonal costs, such as being viewed as troublemakers. An African American job candidateExpand
Why Are Attributions to Discrimination Interpersonally Costly? A Test of System- and Group-Justifying Motivations
TLDR
In two studies, Whites’ endorsement of system-justifying beliefs predicted increased negativity toward Blacks who blamed negative events on discrimination, and participants’ White Identification did not moderate the relationship between the Black target’s attribution for failure and subsequent negative perceptions of that individual, thus providing evidence against a group-justification explanation of these findings. Expand
When Do Men and Women Make Attributions to Gender Discrimination? The Role of Discrimination Source
Two experiments examined the effects of discrimination source on men’s and women’s willingness to make attributions to a sexist experimenter or sexist rules. Students (161 male; 171 females) at a USExpand
Dark and Bright Side of Claiming Discrimination: Making Attributions to Prejudice and Social Wellbeing among Immigrants in Spain
Research on the consequences of making attributions to prejudice for the psychological functioning of minority groups is still scare and rather inconsistent. In this study we set out to examine theExpand
Psychological Consequences of Failing to Attribute Negative Outcomes to Discrimination
The present research examines the psychological consequences of not making attributions to discrimination in response to negative feedback. In two studies, 100 and 80, respectively, femaleExpand
Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity
This study examined group identification and situational ambiguity as moderators of attributions to discrimination and self-esteem following negative feedback. As predicted, high gender-identifiedExpand
Targeting Prejudice
Although Asians in the United States are targets of racial prejudice and discrimination, cultural forces may hinder their acknowledging that such bias has occurred. High personal self-esteem (SE) mayExpand
Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts.
TLDR
Women and African Americans were more likely to report that a failing grade assigned by a man or a European American was caused by discrimination, rather than by their own lack of ability, when they made the judgment privately and in the presence of a fellow stigmatized group member. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES
Reacting to Impending Discrimination: Compensation for Prejudice and Attributions to Discrimination
This experiment tested the hypothesis that stigmatized people attempt to compensate for or overcome the effects of prejudice on social interactions. In an adaptation of Ruggiero and Taylor’sExpand
Social Stigma: The Affective Consequences of Attributional Ambiguity
Two experiments investigated the hypothesis that the stigmatized can protect their self-esteem by attributing negative feedback to prejudice. Fifty-nine women participated in the 1st experiment.Expand
The stigma of overweight: affective consequences of attributional ambiguity.
TLDR
Dimensions of stigma that may account for differences in the tendency to attribute negative outcomes to prejudice, and implications for weight loss programs and psychotherapy for the overweight, are discussed. Expand
Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being.
The processes involved in well-being maintenance among African Americans who differed in their attributions to prejudice were examined. A rejection-iden tification model was proposed where stableExpand
Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.
Although several psychological theories predict that members of stigmatized groups should have low global self-esteem, empirical research typically does not support this prediction. It is proposedExpand
Coping with discrimination: How disadvantaged group members perceive the discrimination that confronts them.
Two experiments examined how disadvantaged group members perceive the discrimination that confronts them. Women reacted to negative feedback after receiving information about the probability thatExpand
“Why Did I Get a ‘D’?” The Effects of Social Comparisons on Women’s Attributions to Discrimination
When do women blame their failure on discrimination? This question was addressed in two experiments by examining the effects of social comparisons on women’s attributions for a failing test grade.Expand
Experiencing Everyday Prejudice and Discrimination
Publisher Summary An individual's actions and efforts to fight against prejudice and discrimination that he may encounter in everyday life depends on how both the blatant and subtle forms ofExpand
Why minority group members perceive or do not perceive the discrimination that confronts them: the role of self-esteem and perceived control.
Self-esteem and perceived control were examined to explain why minority group members sometimes perceive discrimination but, more often, minimize the discrimination. Women (Study 1), and Asians andExpand
Why Didn't She Just Report Him? The Psychological and Legal Implications of Women's Responses to Sexual Harassment
The last few years have seen an increasing awareness of sexual harassment as an important social problem with serious implications for individuals and organizations alike, leading to increasedExpand
...
1
2
3
...