Stochastic Choice and the Allocation of Cognitive Effort

@article{Moffatt2005StochasticCA,
  title={Stochastic Choice and the Allocation of Cognitive Effort},
  author={Peter G. Moffatt},
  journal={Experimental Economics},
  year={2005},
  volume={8},
  pages={369-388}
}
  • P. Moffatt
  • Published 1 December 2005
  • Economics, Psychology
  • Experimental Economics
Data from a risky choice experiment are used to estimate a fully parametric stochastic model of risky choice. As is usual with such analyses, Expected Utility Theory is rejected in favour of a form of Rank Dependent Theory. Then an estimate of the risk aversion parameter is deduced for each subject, and this is used to construct a measure of the “closeness to indifference'' of each subject in each choice problem. This measure is then used as an explanatory variable in a random effects model of… 

Revealed Indifference: Using Response Times to Infer Preferences

Revealed preference is the dominant approach for inferring preferences, but it relies on discrete, stochastic choices. The choice process also produces response times (RTs) which are continuous and

Strength of preference and decisions under risk

Influential economic approaches as random utility models assume a monotonic relation between choice frequencies and “strength of preference,” in line with widespread evidence from the cognitive

Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behaviour in a Broad Population

This econometric model incorporates four structural parameters that vary with observed and unobserved characteristics: Utility curvature, loss aversion, preferences towards the timing of uncertainty resolution, and the propensity to choose randomly rather than on the basis of preferences, which find contribute to explaining choice behaviour.

Does choice change preferences? An incentivized test of the mere choice effect

Widespread evidence from psychology and neuroscience documents that previous choices unconditionally increase the later desirability of chosen objects, even if those choices were uninformative. This

Modeling choice and valuation in decision experiments.

This article develops a parsimonious descriptive model of individual choice and valuation in the kinds of experiments that constitute a substantial part of the literature relating to decision making

Measuring and Comparing Two Kinds of Rationalizable Opportunity Cost in Mixture Models

This work develops a framework for calculating and comparing two kinds of rationalizable opportunity cost from structural mixture models, and demonstrates this framework on data from an existing experiment on decision-making under risk.

An Economist and a Psychologist Form a Line: What Can Imperfect Perception of Length Tell Us About Stochastic Choice?

Standard choice experiments are hampered by the fact that utility is either unknown or imperfectly measured by experimenters. As a consequence, the inferences available to researchers are limited. By

The Predictive Power of Risk Elicitation Tasks

This work reports the results of two online experiments with a general-population sample examining the performance of different tasks for the elicitation of risk attitudes. First, I compare the

Response Times in Economics: Looking Through the Lens of Sequential Sampling Models

Economics is increasingly using process data to make novel inferences about preferences and predictions of choices. The measurement of response time (RT), the amount of time it takes to make a
...

A Microeconometric Test of Alternative Stochastic Theories of Risky Choice

The random preference, Fechner (or ‘white noise’), and constant error (or ‘tremble’) models of stochastic choice under risk are compared. Various combinations of these approaches are used with

Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function

When individuals choose among risky alternatives, the psychological weight attached to an outcome may not correspond to the probability of that outcome. In rank-dependent utility theories, including

Testing Different Stochastic Specificationsof Risky Choice

The Harless-Camerer (HC), Hey-Orme (HO), and random preference (RP) models of stochastic variation in choice under uncertainty are compared. Implications of these models, including some that are

Weighing Risk and Uncertainty

Decision theory distinguishes between risky prospects, where the probabilities associated with the possible outcomes are assumed to be known, and uncertain prospects, where these probabilities are

The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs

Choice designs traditionally have been built under the assumption that all coefficients are zero. The authors show that if there are reasonable nonzero priors for expected coefficients, then these

The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework

We review 74 experiments with no, low, or high performance-based financial incentives. The modal result has no effect on mean performance (though variance is usually reduced by higher payment).

On a lottery pricing anomaly: Time tells the tale

This article identifies a lottery pricing anomaly, which I call the “r=x anomaly,” that is present in past pricing experiments—namely, a tendency for subjects to announce that their minimum selling

Testing for the Presence of a Tremble in Economic Experiments

The classical trinity of tests is used to check for the presence of a tremble in economic experiments in which the response variable is binary. A tremble is said to occur when an agent makes a

A REFORMULATION OF THE THEORY OF CONSUMER'S BEHAVIOUR1

IN this article an attempt will be made to demonstrate, first, that the usual indifference-curve analysis of consumer's demand is logically unsatisfactory; secondly, that a theory of consumer's