Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect.

@article{Bornstein1992StimulusRA,
  title={Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect.},
  author={Robert F. Bornstein and Paul R. D’Agostino},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  year={1992},
  volume={63 4},
  pages={
          545-52
        }
}
A meta-analysis of research on Zajonc's (1968) mere exposure effect indicated that stimuli perceived without awareness produce substantially larger exposure effects than do stimuli that are consciously perceived (Bornstein, 1989a). However, this finding has not been tested directly in the laboratory. Two experiments were conducted comparing the magnitude of the exposure effect produced by 5-ms (i.e., subliminal) stimuli and stimuli presented for longer durations (i.e., 500 ms). In both… 

Figures from this paper

Recognising what you like: Examining the relation between the mere-exposure effect and recognition

The perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere-exposure effect proposed by R. F. Bornstein and P. D'Agostino (1992) predicts that when recognition of a previously presented stimulus is above

Attentional modulation of the mere exposure effect.

The results showed a significant mere exposure effect only for the target shapes involved in attentional selection, even when the participants could recognize the nontarget shapes, indicating that selective attention modulated themere exposure effect.

A Re-Examination of the Mere Exposure Effect: The Influence of Repeated Exposure on Recognition, Familiarity, and Liking

It is concluded that existing models for the mere exposure effect do not adequately account for the findings, and a framework to help guide future research is provided.

Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect

The results show that under these conditions the mere exposure effect does not occur without conscious awareness, and are consistent with the idea that themere exposure effect requires conscious awareness and has important implications for theories of memory and affect.

The Influence of Simultaneous Multiple Exposure on the Mere Exposure Effect

The present results suggest that the simultaneous exposure to multiple stimulus elements could facilitate the MEE but only when the number of stimulus elements does not exceed the capacity of processing resources.

Dissociating mere exposure and repetition priming as a function of word type

A direct comparison between the two phenomena shows a key boundary for observing the mere exposure effect, one not readily accommodated by a perceptual representation systems account, which assumes that both phenomena should show some sensitivity to nonwords and words.

The Attribution and Discounting of Perceptual Fluency: Preliminary Tests of a Perceptual Fluency/Attributional Model of the Mere Exposure Effect

Bornstein and D'Agostino (1990, 1992) hypothesized that the mere exposure effect results from a combination of two processes. First, an increase in perceptual fluency is induced by repeated exposure

The Mere Exposure Instruction Effect: Mere Exposure Instructions Influence Liking

Seven experiments are reported showing that (1) mere exposure instructions influence implicit stimulus evaluations as measured with an Implicit Association Test, personalizedimplicit association test, or Affect Misattribution Procedure, but not with an Evaluative Priming Task, and (3) the instruction effect depends on participants’ memory of which stimulus will be presented more frequently.

The Mere Exposure Effect Is Differentially Sensitive to Different Judgment Tasks

Results are inconsistent with general predictions made by the nonspecific activation hypothesis, but not the affective primacy or perceptual fluency hypotheses which were discussed in terms of cognitive neuroscience research.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES

Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality.

Results from contingency probability analyses and data from replicated and extended the finding that mere exposure to a briefly presented stimulus can increase positive affect through familiarity without enhancing the recognition of that stimulus indicate that affect and recognition judgments are different.

Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test

It is shown that the ability to select target stimuli by affect can occur undiminished over a delay of 1 week between study and test and can serve as the basis for stimulus discrimination in the absence of recognition at the time of test.

The Generalizability of Subliminal Mere Exposure Effects: Influence of Stimuli Perceived Without Awareness on Social Behavior

Three experiments investigating the extent to which subliminal mere exposure effects arc obtainable not only with simple stimuli but also with complex human stimuli in social situations indicate that attitudes toward persons encountered in the natural environment of the psychology experiment are also enhanced by subliminals exposure to a photograph of that person.

Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.

The hypothesis is offered that mere repeated exposure of the individual to a stimulus object enhances his attitude toward it. By "mere" exposure is meant a condition making the stimulus accessible to

Implicit Learning and Generalization of the "Mere Exposure" Effect

Two experiments are reported in which the generalization of the "mere exposure" effect is examined. Both experiments demonstrated that positive affect, produced by repeated viewing of a set of

Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized.

This parametric study has specified the relationship between exposure duration and affect and recognition judgments and has located that temporal window.

Exposure, context, and interpersonal attraction.

Two experiments were performed to determine the effects of mere exposure and positive and negative contexts on interpersonal attraction. In both experiments, exposure was manipulated by varying the

Attitude formation and mere exposure phenomena: A nonartifactual explanation of empirical findings.

Infrequent positive (E+) and negative (E—) words were used as stimuli in exposure experiments. Increased exposure led E+ words to become more positive and E— words to become more negative. Exposure

Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes.

The present set of experiments tested three predictions of the two-process model of recognition memory: Target discrimination equal to that found in the preference task should also occur when subjects make familiarity judgments; recognition performance should improve if the target stimuli are presented and tested with an easily encodable visual context; and both preference and familiarity judgments should be unaffected by manipulations of context.