Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: a reply to Greenwald (2003).

@article{Lien2003StillNE,
  title={Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: a reply to Greenwald (2003).},
  author={M C Lien and Robert W. Proctor and Eric Ruthroff},
  journal={Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance},
  year={2003},
  volume={29 6},
  pages={1267-72}
}
For 30 years, A. G. Greenwald and H. G. Shulman's (1973) psychological refractory period (PRP) study has been cited as evidence for perfect timesharing with ideomotor (IM)-compatible tasks. Recently, M.-C. Lien, R. W. Proctor, and P. A. Allen (2002) failed to replicate these results and concluded that IM compatibility is neither necessary nor sufficient to eliminate the PRP effect. A. G. Greenwald (2003) attributed Lien et al.'s nonreplication to the use of (a) a non-IM-compatible task, (b… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 12 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 20 references

Processing limitations in dual-task performance: Can the central bottleneck be bypassed with ideomotor compatible tasks? Manuscript submitted for publication

  • Lien, M.-C, R. S. McCann, E. Ruthruff, R. W. Proctor
  • 2003
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…