Stevin Numbers and Reality

@article{Katz2012StevinNA,
  title={Stevin Numbers and Reality},
  author={Karin U. Katz and M. Katz},
  journal={Foundations of Science},
  year={2012},
  volume={17},
  pages={109-123}
}
We explore the potential of Simon Stevin’s numbers, obscured by shifting foundational biases and by 19th century developments in the arithmetisation of analysis. 

Figures from this paper

Real numbers as infinite decimals -- theory and computation
TLDR
This article is devoted to solving the historical problem of how to perform arithmetic directly on infinite decimals, which has seen the popular degeometrisation of real numbers since the first constructions were published in around 1872. Expand
Defining arithmetical operations on infinite decimals
Completing Loo-Keng Hua's approach to the real number system pioneered in 1962, this paper defines arithmetical operations directly on infinite decimals without appealing to any ordering structure.Expand
Real numbers as infinite decimals
Stemming from an idea put forward by Loo-Keng Hua in 1962, this article describes an original way to perform arithmetic directly on infinite decimals. This approach leads to a new and elementaryExpand
The real numbers--A survey of constructions
We present a comprehensive survey of constructions of the real numbers (from either the rationals or the integers) in a unified fashion, thus providing an overview of most (if not all) knownExpand
Analyzing Benardete's comment on decimal notation
TLDR
An initially puzzling passage in Benardete on the intelligibility of the continuum reveals challenging insights into number systems, the foundations of modern analysis, and mathematics education. Expand
Proofs and Retributions, Or: Why Sarah Can’t Take Limits
The small, the tiny, and the infinitesimal (to quote Paramedic) have been the object of both fascination and vilification for millenia. One of the most vitriolic reviews in mathematics was thatExpand
A Burgessian Critique of Nominalistic Tendencies in Contemporary Mathematics and its Historiography
We analyze the developments in mathematical rigor from the viewpoint of a Burgessian critique of nominalistic reconstructions. We apply such a critique to the reconstruction of infinitesimal analysisExpand
Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures
TLDR
The proposed formalisations indicate that Robinson’s framework is more helpful in understanding the procedures of the pioneers of mathematical analysis than a Weierstrassian framework, but this does not mean that Fermat, Gregory, Leibniz, Euler, and Cauchy were pre-Robinsonians. Expand
Ten Misconceptions from the History of Analysis and Their Debunking
The widespread idea that infinitesimals were “eliminated” by the “great triumvirate” of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass is refuted by an uninterrupted chain of work on infinitesimal-enriched numberExpand
Gregory’s Sixth Operation
AbstractIn relation to a thesis put forward by Marx Wartofsky, we seek to show that a historiography of mathematics requires an analysis of the ontology of the part of mathematics under scrutiny.Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 76 REFERENCES
C. S. Peirce's Philosophy of Infinite Sets
A study of Peirce's interest in the infinite related to the birth of American mathematics and contemporary work of Cantor and Dedekind.
The Rise of non-Archimedean Mathematics and the Roots of a Misconception I: The Emergence of non-Archimedean Systems of Magnitudes
As a matter of fact, it is by no means impossible to build up a consistent " non-Archimedean " theory of magnitudes in which the axiom of Eudoxus (usually named after Archimedes) does not hold.
On the Infinite and the Infinitesimal in Mathematical Analysis
In the days of our forefathers, when an unsuccessful politician had reached the end of his career, it was customary to grant him one last privilege, that of delivering an address upon topics chosenExpand
Renaissance notions of number and magnitude
Abstract In the 16th and 17th centuries the classical Greek notions of (discrete) number and (continuous) magnitude (preserved in medieval Latin translations of Euclid's Elements) underwent a majorExpand
How to Define a Number? A General Epistemological Account of Simon Stevin’s Art of Defining
This paper explores Simon Stevin’s l’Arithmétique of 1585, where we find a novel understanding of the concept of number. I will discuss the dynamics between his practice and philosophy ofExpand
Peirce's Clarifications of Continuity
This article aims to demonstrate that a careful examination of Peirce's original manuscripts shows that there are five main periods in Peirce's evolution in his mathematical and philosophicalExpand
Conflicts between Generalization, Rigor and Intuition. Number Concepts Underlying the Development of Analysis in 17th-19th Century France and Germany
* Question and Method * Paths Towards Algebraization - Development until the 18th Century. The Number Field * The development of negative numbers * Paths towards algebraization-The field of limits:Expand
Peirce's place in mathematics
Abstract This article compares treatments of the infinite, of continuity and definitions of real numbers produced by the German mathematician Georg Cantor and Richard Dedekind in the late 19thExpand
A Burgessian Critique of Nominalistic Tendencies in Contemporary Mathematics and its Historiography
We analyze the developments in mathematical rigor from the viewpoint of a Burgessian critique of nominalistic reconstructions. We apply such a critique to the reconstruction of infinitesimal analysisExpand
Ten Misconceptions from the History of Analysis and Their Debunking
The widespread idea that infinitesimals were “eliminated” by the “great triumvirate” of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass is refuted by an uninterrupted chain of work on infinitesimal-enriched numberExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...