Stereotype (In)Accuracy in Perceptions of Groups and Individuals

  title={Stereotype (In)Accuracy in Perceptions of Groups and Individuals},
  author={Lee Jussim and Jarret T. Crawford and Rachel S. Rubinstein},
  journal={Current Directions in Psychological Science},
  pages={490 - 497}
Are stereotypes accurate or inaccurate? We summarize evidence that stereotype accuracy is one of the largest and most replicable findings in social psychology. We address controversies in this literature, including the long-standing and continuing but unjustified emphasis on stereotype inaccuracy, how to define and assess stereotype accuracy, and whether stereotypic (vs. individuating) information can be used rationally in person perception. We conclude with suggestions for building theory and… 

Tables from this paper

Racial Bias in Perceptions of Size and Strength: The Impact of Stereotypes and Group Differences

It is found that individuals primarily rely on individuating information when making physical judgments but do not completely discount racial stereotypes, which reflect a combination of real group-level differences and culturally transmitted beliefs.

About Stereotype Accuracy

In this article we argue that there are many unanswered questions crucial to scientific understanding about stereotypes and stereotype accuracy. Scientists do not always engage in purely impartial

Studying Stereotype Accuracy from an Integrative Social‐Personality Perspective

This article proposes an integrative framework for understanding the accuracy and inaccuracy of stereotypes. Specifically, we highlight research issues and traditions from social and personality

Unasked Questions About Stereotype Accuracy

In this paper, we argue that there are many unanswered questions crucial to scientific understanding about stereotypes and stereotype accuracy. Scientists do not always engage in purely impartial

Real Men Don’t Say “Cute”

People associate certain behaviors with certain social groups. These stereotypical beliefs consist of both accurate and inaccurate associations. Using large-scale, data-driven methods with social

Individual Differences in Miserly Thinking Predict Endorsement of Racial/Ethnic Stereotypes

The “cognitive miser” metaphor is a classic characterization of mental life wherein cognitive efficiency is favored over careful and reflective thinking. A presumed implication is that reliance on

Exaggerating Accessible Differences: When Gender Stereotypes Overestimate Actual Group Differences

  • Tal EyalN. Epley
  • Psychology, Sociology
    Personality & social psychology bulletin
  • 2017
It is suggested that the most accessible stereotype content involves attributes perceived to differ between groups, and those attributes are most likely to exaggerate actual group differences due to regression to the mean.

It Is Hard to Read Minds without Words: Cues to Use to Achieve Empathic Accuracy

Two predictors of empathic accuracy are explored: use of stereotypes about the target’s group, and use of the target's own words, which appear to be a useful cue to empathy accuracy, even in tricky contexts that cross cultural lines.

Intergroup stereotyping

Accuracy, bias, self-fulfilling prophecies, and scientific self-correction

  • L. Jussim
  • Psychology
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • 2017
The limitations to the tripartite pattern, the role of politics and confirmation biases in distorting scientific conclusions, common obstructions to effective scientific self-correction, and how to limit them are considered.



Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes.

Three forms of stereotype inaccuracy are identified: stereotypic inaccuracy, valence inaccurate, and dispersion inaccuracy; the implications of each form are discussed, along with how each can be assessed using a full-accuracy design.

The Inaccuracy of National Character Stereotypes.

The Role of Stereotyping in Overconfident Social Prediction

A field study methodology was used to study the role that stereotyping and prototypicality assessment play in overconfident social prediction. Preliminary research verified the existence of distinct

Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination

In the first comprehensive textbook on prejudice with a strong psychological research base, Whitley and Kite cover a broad range of topics including race and ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation,

Stereotypes of age differences in personality traits: universal and accurate?

These consensual age group stereotypes correlated strongly with published age differences on the five major dimensions of personality and most of 30 specific traits, using as criteria of accuracy both self-reports and observer ratings, different survey methodologies, and data from up to 50 nations.

Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality.

Three experiments explored the effects of categorical information (stereotypes) and case information (traits or behaviors) on judgments about an individual's characteristics and found that trait inferences were a function of both the stereotypic and the behavioral information.

The politics of gaydar: ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation.

Liberals were less likely than conservatives to endorse stereotypes about gender inversion and sexual orientation, and this difference in stereotype endorsement was partially explained by liberals' greater need for cognition.

Gender Stereotypes of Personality

Numerous studies have documented subtle but consistent sex differences in self-reports and observer-ratings of five-factor personality traits, and such effects were found to show well-defined

What Do Cross-National Comparisons of Personality Traits Tell Us?

This study found that country-level self- and peer-report measures of conscientiousness failed as markers of between-nation differences in personality.

Précis of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy

  • L. Jussim
  • Psychology
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • 2015
The time is long overdue to replace cherry-picked and unjustified stories emphasizing error, bias, the power of self-fulfilling prophecies, and the inaccuracy of stereotypes with conclusions that more closely correspond to the full range of empirical findings, which includes multiple failed replications of classic expectancy studies, meta-analyses consistently demonstrating small or at best moderate expectancy effects, and high accuracy in social perception.