Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank‐free lists: is Linnaeus dead?

@article{Benton2000StemsNC,
  title={Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank‐free lists: is Linnaeus dead?},
  author={M. Benton},
  journal={Biological Reviews},
  year={2000},
  volume={75}
}
  • M. Benton
  • Published 2000
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Biological Reviews
  • Recent radical proposals to overhaul the methods of biological classification are reviewed. The proposals of phylogenetic nomenclature are to translate cladistic phylogenies directly into classifications, and to define taxon names in terms of clades. The method has a number of radical consequences for biologists: taxon names must depend rigidly on the particular cladogram favoured at the moment, familiar names may be reassigned to unfamiliar groupings, Linnaean category terms (e.g. phylum… CONTINUE READING
    132 Citations

    Topics from this paper

    Phylogenetic hypotheses, taxa and nomina in zoology
    • 32
    • PDF
    Stability, ranks, and the PhyloCode
    • 12
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue?
    • 68
    Optimality of phylogenetic nomenclatural procedures
    • 28
    PHYLOGENETIC NOMENCLATURE AND PALEONTOLOGY
    • 37
    • Highly Influenced
    The Phylocode: Beating a dead horse?
    • 14
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 84 REFERENCES
    Species names in phylogenetic nomenclature.
    • 119
    • PDF
    Stability in meaning and content of taxon names: an evaluation of crown-clade definitions
    • M. S. Lee
    • Biology
    • Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
    • 1996
    • 38