Standards of Proof

  title={Standards of Proof},
  author={George HS Singer and Robert H Horner and Glen Dunlap and Mian Wang},
  journal={Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities},
  pages={178 - 188}
  • G. Singer, R. Horner, Mian Wang
  • Published 1 September 2014
  • Psychology
  • Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
TASH’s historic commitment to advocacy and science has enabled it to be a trusted voice for people with severe disabilities and their families. We review recent developments in the controversy over facilitated communication (FC) in light of major contextual continuities and changes in the past two decades. A series of scholarly reviews of the literature on controlled experiments have established a preponderance of evidence that FC is not reliably an expression from the individual who receives… 

Tables from this paper

Evidence-Based and Values-Based Practices for People With Severe Disabilities
This article discusses the relationship between evidence-based practices (EBPs) and values in research and practice pertaining to people with severe disabilities. The importance of basing educational
Facilitated Communication
The value and utility of Facilitated Communication (FC), currently referred to as “supported typing,” has been one of the most highly contested issues for TASH. TASH members come from diverse
The Uses of Qualitative Research
This article offers a rationale for the contributions of qualitative research to evidence-based practice in special education. In it, I make the argument that qualitative research encompasses the
Facilitated Communication: The Resurgence of a Disproven Treatment for Individuals With Autism
This column examines the use of one such false treatment, facilitated communication, that has reemerged despite a substantial body of evidence discrediting it.
Picture Exchange Communication System and Facilitated Communication: Contrasting an Evidence-Based Practice with a Discredited Method
Abstract Learners with autism require specialized education and supports to ensure acquisition and mastery of various communication skills. This is particularly true for individuals whose disability
Systematic review of facilitated communication 2014–2018 finds no new evidence that messages delivered using facilitated communication are authored by the person with disability
A systematic review of the literature on FC published between 2014 and 2018 found no new studies on authorship and there remains no evidence that FC is a valid form of communication for individuals with severe communication disabilities.
Facilitated communication, Anna Stubblefield and disability studies
Abstract This article discusses the case of Anna Stubblefield, a US disability studies scholar and Professor of Ethics at Rutgers University who was sentenced to 12 years in prison for sexually
Facilitated Communication
Behavioral and Educational Interventions
Establishing the State of Affairs for Evidence-Based Practices in Students With Severe Disabilities
The use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) was mandated with the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), and continues with the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). Accordingly, all


Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action.
During his research pursuits, John Wennberg has uncovered systematic and persistent differences in the standardized rates of use for common surgical procedures and other medical services in the United States.
Evidence-Based Practices and Implementation Science in Special Education
Establishing a process for identifying evidence-based practices (EBPs) in special education has been a significant advance for the field because it has the potential for generating more effective
Facilitated Communication and Its Legitimacy—Twenty-First Century Developments
By 2001, Facilitated Communication (FC) had largely been empirically discredited as an effective intervention for previously uncommunicative persons with disabilities, especially those with autism
Facilitated Communication and Authorship: A Systematic Review
A synthesis of the extant peer-reviewed literature on the question of authorship in Facilitated Communication indicated unequivocal evidence for facilitator control: messages generated through FC are authored by the facilitators rather than the individuals with disabilities.
Parent-Professional Partnership in Behavioral Support: A Qualitative Analysis of One Family's Experience
Behavioral support with families is a multifaceted endeavor that should be studied from the various perspectives that affect its feasibility, efficacy, and potential to produce outcomes that are
Facilitated Communication Since 1995: A Review of Published Studies
  • M. Mostert
  • Psychology
    Journal of autism and developmental disorders
  • 2001
This review examines published FC studies since the previous major reviews and critiques and discounts the claims of two studies purporting to offer empirical evidence of FC efficacy using control procedures.
Who May Be Literate? Disability and Resistance to the Cultural Denial of Competence
The authors present four themes of literate disconnection and ponder the moral shift necessary to craft a science of literacy for all.
Contested Words, Contested Science: Unraveling the Facilitated Communication Controversy
A collection of studies providing evidence in support of facilitated communication are presented, including a study carried out by a person who uses facilitated communication, Eugene Marcus, a young man with autism.
Authorship in Facilitated Communication: An Analysis of 11 Cases
Analysis of the authorship of messages produced through facilitated communication for all users of FC in two comprehensive schools in a small city in Finland revealed a large degree of facilitator influence on the content of the messages produced.
A qualitative study of Parent to Parent support for parents of children with special needs. Consortium to evaluate Parent to Parent.
Qualitative analysis reveals a successful match is contingent upon creation of a "reliable ally" in the supporting parent, comprised of four main components: perceived sameness, situational comparisons that enable learning and growth, round-the-clock availability of support, and mutuality of support.