Standardised data on initiatives—STARDIT: Beta version

@article{Nunn2022StandardisedDO,
  title={Standardised data on initiatives—STARDIT: Beta version},
  author={Jack S. Nunn and Thomas M A Shafee},
  journal={Research Involvement and Engagement},
  year={2022},
  volume={8}
}
Background and objective There is currently no standardised way to share information across disciplines about initiatives, including fields such as health, environment, basic science, manufacturing, media and international development. All problems, including complex global problems such as air pollution and pandemics require reliable data sharing between disciplines in order to respond effectively. Current reporting methods also lack information about the ways in which different people and… 

Co-designing genomics research with a large group of donor-conceived siblings

TLDR
Findings from this case study help inform how people from certain sub-populations should be involved in planning and defining their participation in genomic research; particularly those from more vulnerable or high-interest populations.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 203 REFERENCES

The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance

TLDR
The goal is that stewards and other users of Indigenous data will ‘Be FAIR and CARE’ and the Principles complement the existing data-centric approach represented in the ‘FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship’ (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable).

What Is Citizen Science? – A Scientometric Meta-Analysis

TLDR
This study analyzes two datasets retrieved from the Web of Science with the aim of giving a scientometric description of what the concept of CS entails, and accounts for its development over time, and what strands of research that has adopted CS and an assessment of what scientific output has been achieved in CS-related projects.

Public Involvement in Global Genomics Research: A Scoping Review

TLDR
There would be intrinsic value in having more public involvement occur in human genomics research worldwide, and it is suggested that more systematic ways of reporting and evaluating involvement would be highly beneficial, to help develop best practices.

Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future

TLDR
The NIHR is the first funder of its size and importance globally to review its approach to public involvement and there is a need to consolidate progress and accelerate the spread of effective practice, drawing on evidence.

Developing Stakeholder Involvement for Introducing Public Health Genomics into Public Policy

TLDR
Some of the areas of public policy that might involve PHG are discussed, principles on the need for stakeholder involvement are set out, and the range of potential stakeholders that need to be considered when working to incorporate PHG into new and existing policies are described.

A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities

TLDR
This is the first international systematic review to focus on the impact of PPI on the people involved in the process, highlighting the importance of optimising the context and processes of involvement, so creating the potential for PPI to impact positively on the research itself.

Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch

TLDR
The findings confirm the mismatch first described by Tallon et al. 15 years ago and suggest that the research community should make greater efforts to address issues of importance to users of research, such as patients and healthcare professionals.

Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms

Much can be at stake depending on the choice of words used to describe citizen science, because terminology impacts how knowledge is developed. Citizen science is a quickly evolving field that is

Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review

TLDR
By comprehensively mapping potential outcome and process metrics as well as existing P2C2 engagement tools, this review supports high-quality P2 C2 engagement globally by informing the selection of existing evaluation tools and identifying gaps where new tools are needed.
...