Staged Mucosal Advancement Flap versus Staged Fibrin Sealant in the Treatment of Complex Perianal Fistulas

@article{Hagen2011StagedMA,
  title={Staged Mucosal Advancement Flap versus Staged Fibrin Sealant in the Treatment of Complex Perianal Fistulas},
  author={S. J. van der Hagen and C. Baeten and P. Soeters and W. V. van Gemert},
  journal={Gastroenterology Research and Practice},
  year={2011},
  volume={2011}
}
Background. [...] Key Result The MF group (5 females and 10 males) with a median age of 51 years and a median followup of 52 months. The FS group (4 females and 11 males) with a median age of 45 years and a median followup of 49 months. Three (20%) patients of the MF group had a recurrent fistula compared to 9 (60%) of the FS group (P = 0.03). No new continence disorders developed. Conclusion. Staged FS injection has a much lower success rate compared to MF.Expand
16 Citations
Rectal advancement flap for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • 42
  • Highly Influenced
Long-term outcome of low perianal fistulas treated by fistulotomy: a multicenter study
  • 33
Guided Treatment Improves Outcome of Patients with Enterocutaneous Fistulas
  • 50
  • PDF
German S3 guidelines: anal abscess and fistula (second revised version)
  • 42
  • PDF
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 REFERENCES
Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Advancement Flap Repair of Complex Anal Fistulas
  • 67
Efficacy of Fibrin Sealant in the Management of Complex Anal Fistula
  • 201
Anocutaneous advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas
  • 114
Smoking Impairs Rectal Mucosal Bloodflow—A Pilot Study: Possible Implications for Transanal Advancement Flap Repair
  • 35
Efficacy of Anal Fistula Plug vs. Fibrin Glue in Closure of Anorectal Fistulas
  • 299
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
...