Split Definitive: How Party Polarization Turned the Supreme Court into a Partisan Court

@article{Devins2017SplitDH,
  title={Split Definitive: How Party Polarization Turned the Supreme Court into a Partisan Court},
  author={N. Devins and L. Baum},
  journal={The Supreme Court Review},
  year={2017},
  volume={2016},
  pages={301 - 365}
}
Since 2010, when Elena Kagan replaced John Paul Stevens, all of the Republican-nominated Justices on the Supreme Court have been to the right of all of its Democratic-nominated Justices. This pattern is widely recognized, but it is not well recognized that it is unique in the Court’s history. Before 2010, the Court never had clear ideological blocs that coincided with party lines. Today’s partisan split, while unprecedented, is likely enduring.The very political changes that underlie the… Expand
1 Citations
Affective Polarization and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court
Support for the U.S. Supreme Court does not appear to be polarized on ideological or partisan lines. However, the form of polarization for which the mass political behavior field has amassed substa...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 76 REFERENCES
Selection of Law Clerks and Polarization in the U.S. Supreme Court
Scholars have pointed to signs of growing polarization in American politics along partisan and ideological lines. This article probes for polarization in the Supreme Court by examining the role ofExpand
The Politics of Selecting the Bench from the Bar: The Legal Profession and Partisan Incentives to Politicize the Judiciary
The American judiciary has increasingly come under attack as polarized and politicized. Using a newly collected dataset that captures the ideological positioning of nearly half a million judges andExpand
Why the Center Does Not Hold: The Causes of Hyperpolarized Democracy in America
Politics as partisan warfare: that is our world. Over the last generation, American democracy has had one defining attribute: extreme partisan polarization. We have not seen the intensity ofExpand
The Most Democratic Branch: How the Courts Serve America
Many critics attack federal judges as anti-democratic elitists, activists out of step with the mainstream of American thought. But others argue that judges should stand alone as the ultimateExpand
Campaigns and the Court: The U.S. Supreme Court in Presidential Elections
1. The Constitution, Politics, and the Supreme Court2. The Election of 1800: Partisan Beginnings3. The Election of 1832: Partisanship Revived4. The Election of 1860: Limits of Partisanship5. TheExpand
The Federalist Society's Influence on the Federal Judiciary
Only twenty-five years after its founding, the Federalist Society today boasts a nationwide membership including renowned attorneys, politicians, policy makers, and jurists. Although the SocietyExpand
Back to “Business” at the Supreme Court: The “Administrative Side” of Chief Justice Roberts
This November, like every November for decades, the Harvard Law Review published its annual review of the U.S. Supreme Court’s most recently completed Term — October Term 2014.1 The November issue’sExpand
The Political Ideologies of American Lawyers
The ideology of American lawyers has been a persistent source of discussion and debate. Two obstacles, however, have prevented this topic from being systematically studied: the sheer number ofExpand
Sorcerers' Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court
IllustrationsAcknowledgments Preface: Awesome Responsibility and Complete Subservience 1 Introduction: The Institutionalization of the Supreme Court Law Clerk 2 A Great Ordeal: Selecting SupremeExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...