Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Comparison of Time Efficiency, Costs, Charges, and Complications

@article{Riley1995SpinalVE,
  title={Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Comparison of Time Efficiency, Costs, Charges, and Complications},
  author={Edward T. Riley and Sheila E. Cohen and Alex Macario and Jayshree Bhalabhai Desai and Emily F. Ratner},
  journal={Anesthesia \& Analgesia},
  year={1995},
  volume={80},
  pages={709-712.}
}
Spinal anesthesia recently has gained popularity for elective cesarean section.Our anesthesia service changed from epidural to spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section in 1991. To evaluate the significance of this change in terms of time management, costs, charges, and complication rates, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who had received epidural (n = 47) or spinal (n = 47) anesthesia for nonemergent cesarean section. Patients who received epidural anesthesia had… 
Comparison of maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section
TLDR
This pilot study demonstrated higher maternal satisfaction with epidural than with spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section, related to the increased side effects caused by neuraxial morphine.
Comparison of Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia for a Cesarean Section and Postoperative Pain Control
TLDR
The time to reach the maximal level of sensory blockade and the time intervals to start the operation after an anesthetic injection were significantly shorter in the SA group than in the EA group.
Patient comfort: spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.
TLDR
A retrospective survey of 150 women who had undergone cesarean section under regional anesthesia found that in addition to costing less time and money, spinal anesthesia was also favored by the patient population.
Maternal Experience During Epidural or Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
TLDR
It is concluded that maternal conditions and experience were good with both methods, although CSEA conferred several minor advantages, and both techniques were associated with low anesthetic failure rates, good operative conditions, and high maternal satisfaction levels.
Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severely preeclamptic patients: a retrospective survey.
TLDR
The magnitudes of maternal blood pressure declines were similar after spinal or epidural anesthesia in this series of severely preeclamptic patients receiving cesarean section, and Maternal and fetal outcomes also were similar.
Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study
TLDR
There was no statistically significant difference among the three types of anesthesia regarding neonatal intensive care admission and length of hospital stay for emergency and elective categories.
Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severe preeclampsia: a prospective randomized, multicenter study.
TLDR
The results of this large prospective study support the use of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severely preeclamptic patients and find that there was a statistically significant difference in MAP.
Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Severe Preeclampsia: A Prospective Randomized, Multicenter Study
TLDR
The results of this large prospective study support the use of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severely preeclamptic patients, with more patients in the spinal group exhibiting hypotension than the epidural group.
The Anesthetic Management of Triplet Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Case Series of Maternal Outcomes
TLDR
The data suggest that both epidural and spinal anesthesia for triplet cesarean delivery are safe techniques, but the latter is associated with a larger initial decrease in systolic blood pressure.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES
[Comparison between the effects of epidural and spinal anesthesia for selective cesarean section].
TLDR
Significantly higher pain scores were found in epidural than spinal anesthesia during p1 to p4, however no significant differences were found during p5 to p7, which may be due to post-delivery intravenous injection of other analgesics and sedatives.
Fetal Acid—Base State Following Spinal or Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section
TLDR
Women receiving spinal anesthesia for repeat cesarean section should be given an intravenous fluid load of 1 liter or more, and in cases of severe hypotension the hypotensive episode was shorter and easier to treat when the preanesthetic fluid load was 1000 to 1500 ml rather than 500 to 999 ml.
The Sprotte needle and post dural puncture headache following caesarean section.
TLDR
It is concluded that the 24 gauge Sprotte needle is associated with a comparatively low but clinically relevant incidence of headache in the obstetric population.
Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section
TLDR
It was concluded that a short period of maternal hypotension sustained during the initiation of spinal analgesia for Caesarean section was not harmful to the neonate.
Unintentional dural puncture. A survey of recognition and management
TLDR
In seven cases, dural puncture was not recognised at the time of occurrence and two patients may have subsequently received mixed epidural and subarachnoid analgesia, and the provision of an epidural infusion of Hartmann's solution for 24 hours, together with bed rest, appeared to delay the onset of duraluncture headache rather than prevent it entirely.
Needle bevel direction and headache after inadvertent dural puncture.
TLDR
Identifying the epidural space with the needle bevel oriented parallel to the longitudinal dural fibers limits the size of the subsequent dural tear and, therefore, lowers the incidence of headache should dural perforation occur.
Sprotte needle for intrathecal anaesthesia for Caesarean section: incidence of postdural puncture headache
TLDR
Caesarean section was performed under spinal anaesthesia in 55 women using a 25‐gauge diamond‐tipped needle and in a further 55 mothers with a 24‐g Gauge Sprotte needle and there were no headaches reported in the former group.
Unintentional dural puncture
TLDR
There was a difference between the effects of parallel and perpendicular needle insertion was significant (p < 0.01) and bearing in mind the facl that cinchocaine is no longer available I suggest that bupivacaine 0.5% in 6% dextrose is suggested.
...
1
2
...