• DOI:10.1038/s41559-020-1198-2
• Corpus ID: 218879068

Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land

@article{Lenoir2020SpeciesBT,
  title={Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land},
  author={Jonathan Lenoir and Romain Bertrand and Lise Comte and Luana Bourgeaud and Tarek Hattab and J{\'e}r{\^o}me Murienne and Ga{\"e}l Grenouillet},
  journal={Nature Ecology \& Evolution},
  year={2020},
  pages={1-16}
}

• J. Lenoir, R. Bertrand, +4 authors G. Grenouillet
• Published 25 May 2020
• Environmental Science, Medicine
• Nature Ecology & Evolution

There is mounting evidence of species redistribution as climate warms. Yet, our knowledge of the coupling between species range shifts and isotherm shifts remains limited. Here, we introduce BioShifts—a global geo-database of 30,534 range shifts. Despite a spatial imbalance towards the most developed regions of the Northern Hemisphere and a taxonomic bias towards the most charismatic animals and plants of the planet, data show that marine species are better at tracking isotherm shifts, and move towards the pole six times faster than terrestrial species. More specifically, we find that marine species closely track shifting isotherms in warm and relatively undisturbed waters (for example, the Central Pacific Basin) or in cold waters subject to high human pressures (for example, the North Sea). On land, human activities impede the capacity of terrestrial species to track isotherm shifts in latitude, with some species shifting in the opposite direction to isotherms. Along elevational gradients, species follow the direction of isotherm shifts but at a pace that is much slower than expected, especially in areas with warm climates. Our results suggest that terrestrial species are lagging behind shifting isotherms more than marine species, which is probably related to the interplay between the wider thermal safety margin of terrestrial versus marine species and the more constrained physical environment for dispersal in terrestrial versus marine habitats. Compiling a global geo-database of >30,000 range shifts, the authors show that marine species closely track shifting isotherms, whereas terrestrial species lag behind, probably due to wider thermal safety margins and movement constraints imposed by human activities.