• DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x
• Corpus ID: 3163864

Spacing Effects in Learning

@article{Cepeda2008SpacingEI,
  title={Spacing Effects in Learning},
  author={Nicholas Cepeda and Edward Vul and Doug Rohrer and John T. Wixted and Harold Pashler},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2008},
  volume={19},
  pages={1095 - 1102}
}

• N. Cepeda, E. Vul, +2 authors H. Pashler
• Published 1 November 2008
• Psychology
• Psychological Science

To achieve enduring retention, people must usually study information on multiple occasions. How does the timing of study events affect retention? Prior research has examined this issue only in a spotty fashion, usually with very short time intervals. In a study aimed at characterizing spacing effects over significant durations, more than 1,350 individuals were taught a set of facts and—after a gap of up to 3.5 months—given a review. A final test was administered at a further delay of up to 1 year. At any given test delay, an increase in the interstudy gap at first increased, and then gradually reduced, final test performance. The optimal gap increased as test delay increased. However, when measured as a proportion of test delay, the optimal gap declined from about 20 to 40% of a 1-week test delay to about 5 to 10% of a 1-year test delay. The interaction of gap and test delay implies that many educational practices are highly inefficient.