Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.

  title={Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.},
  author={Jeffrey D. Karpicke and Althea Bauernschmidt},
  journal={Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition},
  volume={37 5},
Repeated retrieval enhances long-term retention, and spaced repetition also enhances retention. A question with practical and theoretical significance is whether there are particular schedules of spaced retrieval (e.g., gradually expanding the interval between tests) that produce the best learning. In the present experiment, subjects studied and were tested on items until they could recall each one. They then practiced recalling the items on 3 repeated tests that were distributed according to… 

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

Between-list lag effects in recall depend on retention interval
This research shows that even when the benefits of lag are eliminated at a (relatively long) one-day retention interval, the lag effect reemerges after a one-week retention interval.
A comparison of adaptive and fixed schedules of practice.
Two studies investigated an adaptive spacing algorithm that uses response-time and accuracy to generate spacing, and found that adaptive scheduling based on ongoing assessments of learning strength yields greater learning gains than fixed schedules, a finding that helps to understand the spacing effect theoretically and has direct applications for enhancing learning in many domains.
A Meta-Analytic Review of the Benefit of Spacing out Retrieval Practice Episodes on Retention
Spaced retrieval practice consists of repetitions of the same retrieBjorkval event distributed through time. This learning strategy combines two “desirable difficulties”: retrieval practice and
How the Amount and Spacing of Retrieval Practice Affect the Short- and Long-Term Retention of Mathematics Knowledge
Retrieving information from memory increases the likelihood the information will be remembered later. The strategic use of retrieval to enhance memory is known as retrieval practice. Teachers can
Developing a Mind: Learning in Humans, Animals, and Machines
Spacing presentations of learning items across time improves memory relative to massed schedules of practice – the well-known spacing effect. Spaced practice can be further enhanced by adaptively
Distinct episodic contexts enhance retrieval-based learning
Findings redefine and refine previous accounts of the episodic context model of retrieval-based learning and suggest that updated representations of the more distinct temporal contexts associated with spaced retrievals facilitate later recall.
Level of initial training moderates the effects of distributing practice over multiple days with expanding, contracting, and uniform schedules: Evidence for study-phase retrieval
An apparent trend in the literature for expanding schedules to be more advantageous than other schedules following a low level of training during the initial learning session, but not following a high level of initial training is experimentally assessed.
The spacing effect stands up to big data
Many studies have shown that repetition of study material with temporal gaps between the repetitions (i.e., spaced in time) is more effective for long-term retention than are repetitions in immediate
  • Tatsuya Nakata
  • Psychology, Mathematics
    Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • 2015
Although expanding spacing is often regarded as the most effective practice schedule, studies comparing equal and expanding spacing have yielded mixed results. The present study set out to examine
Learning Better, Learning More: The Benefits of Expanded Retrieval Practice
How can learning within a study session be optimized? Practically, there is a functionally unlimited amount of information that could be learned, but learners have limited time. Across two


Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.
The authors found that expanding retrieval practice of vocabulary word pairs produced short-term benefits 10 min after learning, conceptually replicating Landauer and Bjork's results, but equally spaced retrieval produced superior retention 2 days later.
Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?
Overall it was found that repeated testing enhanced retention more than did taking a single test, testing with feedback produced better retention than testing without feedback, but most importantly there were no differences between expanding and equally spaced schedules of retrieval practice.
Expanded vs. Equal Interval Spaced Retrieval Practice: Exploring Different Schedules of Spacing and Retention Interval in Younger and Older Adults
  • J. Logan, D. Balota
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition
  • 2008
Although there were no robust advantages for expanded retrieval compared to equal interval practice, there could be certain advantages to using expanded retrieval depending on the ultimate goals of an individual memory training program.
Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention
Abstract Tests not only measure the contents of memory, they can also enhance learning and long-term retention. We report two experiments inspired by Tulving’s (1967) pioneering work on the effects
2.06 – Repetition and Spacing Effects
Repetition typically leads to steady improvement in performance and memory, though this does not mean that all aspects of learning take place gradually. As a result of repeated practice, memories are
Application of the Testing and Spacing Effects to Name Learning
SUMMARY Four experiments investigated the effects of testing and spacing on the learning of face-name stimulus-response pairs. Experiments 1a and 1b compared the recall of names following intervening
Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: When and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention
The results suggest that the extent to which learners benefit from expanding retrieval practice depends on the degree to which the to-belearned information is vulnerable to forgetting.
Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice
Results suggest that dropout can be a more efficient learning schedule for students than can conventional schedules of practice, and it was particularly effective for learning initially incorrect items.
Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall
Spacing multiple study opportunities apart from one another is known by psychologists to be a highly effective study method (see Dempster, 1996). This study examines whether including tests during
Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.
A compelling metacognitive illusion that occurs during self-regulated learning is identified: Once students can recall an item they tend to believe they have "learned" it, which leads students to terminate practice rather than practice retrieval, a strategy choice that ultimately results in poor retention.