Sources of variability in human communicative skills

@article{Volman2012SourcesOV,
  title={Sources of variability in human communicative skills},
  author={Inge Volman and Matthijs Leendert Noordzij and Ivan Toni},
  journal={Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  year={2012},
  volume={6}
}
When established communication systems cannot be used, people rapidly create novel systems to modify the mental state of another agent according to their intentions. However, there are dramatic inter-individual differences in the implementation of this human competence for communicative innovation. Here we characterize psychological sources of inter-individual variability in the ability to build a shared communication system from scratch. We consider two potential sources of variability in… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

What drives successful verbal communication?

TLDR
Testing which cognitive traits account for communicative success during a verbal referential task extends to the domain of verbal communication the notion that motivational and cognitive factors influence the human ability to rapidly converge on shared communicative innovations.

Neural mechanisms of communicative innovation

TLDR
Using magnetoencephalography, this work assess spectral, temporal, and spatial characteristics of neural activity evoked when people generate and understand novel shared symbols during live communicative interactions and finds shared neuronal up-regulation was spatially localized to the right temporal lobe and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and emerged already before the occurrence of a specific communicative problem.

Understanding communicative actions: A repetitive TMS study

Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaning

TLDR
Using coherence spectral-density analysis of cerebral activity simultaneously measured in pairs of communicators, this study shows that establishing mutual understanding of novel signals synchronizes cerebral dynamics across communicators’ right temporal lobes, favor the notion that meaning emerges from shared conceptualizations of a signal’s use.

Understanding understanding: A computational-level perspective

TLDR
It is found that the specificity of the observed trial-by-trial adjustments made by communicators is parsimoniously explained by perspective taking, but not by simple heuristics, suggesting that humans do have a computationally efficient way of taking beliefs and knowledge of a recipient into account.

Modulating Action Duration to Establish Nonconventional Communication

TLDR
The results of 3 experiments demonstrate that knowledgeable actors spontaneously and systematically adjusted the duration of their actions to communicate task-relevant information if the naïve co-actor could not access this information in other ways.

Informing, Coordinating, and Performing: A Perspective on Functions of Sensorimotor Communication

TLDR
This article aims to disentangle three of these functions of sensorimotor communication: an informing function of body movements, to highlight action intentions for an observer; a coordinating function of bodies, to facilitate real-time action prediction in joint action; and a performing function, to elicit emotional or aesthetic experiences in an audience.

Movement speaks for itself: The kinematic and neural dynamics of communicative action and gesture

TLDR
This study highlights the general communicative modulation of action and gesture kinematics during production but shows that addressees only exploit this modulation to recognize communicative intention in the absence of eye-gaze, and discusses these findings in terms of distinctive but potentially overlapping functions of addressee directed eye-Gaze and kinematic modulations within the wider context of human communication and learning.

Using Violations of Fitts' Law to Communicate during Joint Action

TLDR
It is suggested that generating and perceiving systematic deviations from the predicted duration of a goal-directed action can enable non-conventionalized forms of communication during joint action.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES

Recipient design in tacit communication

Exploring the cognitive infrastructure of communication

TLDR
A new task is developed that taps directly into the underlying abilities to communicate in the absence of a conventional code, and it is shown that subjects are remarkably successful communicators under these conditions, especially when senders get feedback from receivers.

Neural Correlates of Intentional Communication

TLDR
The characteristics of this predictive mechanism support the notion that human communicative abilities are distinct from both sensorimotor and linguistic processes.

Recipient design in human communication: simple heuristics or perspective taking?

TLDR
It is found that the specificity of the observed trial-by-trial adjustments made by communicators is parsimoniously explained by perspective taking, but not by simple heuristics, which suggests that humans do have a computationally efficient way of taking beliefs and knowledge of a recipient into account.

Origins of human communication

Winner, 2009 Eleanor Maccoby Book Award in Developmental Psychology, presented by the American Psychological Association. and Honorable Mention, Literature, Language & Linguistics category, 2008

Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication

TLDR
This work targets the neglected but crucial issue of how people organize their non-verbal behavior to communicate a given intention without pre-established conventions and finds robust evidence that planning new communicative actions and recognizing the communicative intention of the same actions relied on spatially overlapping portions of their brains.

Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis

TLDR
Supporting the cultural intelligence hypothesis and contradicting the hypothesis that humans simply have more “general intelligence,” it is found that the children and chimpanzees had very similar cognitive skills for dealing with the physical world but that theChildren had more sophisticated cognitive skills than either of the ape species for dealingWith the social world.

Intentional Communication: Computationally Easy or Difficult?

TLDR
A methodology for studying and characterizing the computational complexity of communication under different situational constraints is presented and opens the way to a principled identification of putative model parameters that control cognitive processes supporting intentional communication.

An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems

TLDR
Communication systems emerged and developed rapidly during the games, integrating the use of explicit signs with information implicitly available to players and silent behavior-coordinating procedures, suggesting sign forms are perceptually distinct, easy to produce, and tolerant to variations.