Sound and fury: McCloskey and significance testing in economics

@article{Hoover2005SoundAF,
  title={Sound and fury: McCloskey and significance testing in economics},
  author={Kevin D. Hoover and Mark V. Siegler},
  journal={Journal of Economic Methodology},
  year={2005},
  volume={15},
  pages={1 - 37}
}
For more than 20 years, Deidre McCloskey has campaigned to convince the economics profession that it is hopelessly confused about statistical significance. She argues that many practices associated with significance testing are bad science and that most economists routinely employ these bad practices: ‘Though to a child they look like science, with all that really hard math, no science is being done in these and 96 percent of the best empirical economics …’ (McCloskey 1999). McCloskey's charges… 

Statistical vs. economic significance in economics and econometrics: further comments on McCloskey and Ziliak

I comment on the controversy between McCloskey and Ziliak and Hoover and Siegler on statistical versus economic significance, in the March 2008 issue of the Journal of Economic Methodology. I argue

Economic Signi fi cance in Economics and Econometrics : Further comments on McCloskey & Ziliak ∗

I comment on the controversy between McCloskey & Ziliak and Hoover & Siegler on statistical versus economic significance, in the March 2008 issue of the Journal of Economic Methodology. I argue that

Ziliak and McClosky ' s criticisms of significance tests : A damage assessment

D. N. McCloskey and Stephen Ziliak have criticized economists and others for confounding statistical and substantive significance, and for committing the logical error of the transposed conditional.

Ziliak and McClosky?s Criticisms of Significance Tests: A Damage Assessment

D. N. McCloskey and Stephen Ziliak have criticized economists and others for confounding statistical and substantive significance, and for committing the logical error of the transposed conditional.

ERASMUS JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY AND ECONOMICS

The stated objective of this book is to bring out the widespread abuse of significance testing in economics with a view to motivate the proposed solution to the long-standing problem of statistical

Ziliak and McCloskey's Criticisms of Significance Tests: An Assessment

Stephen Ziliak and D. N. McCloskey have sharply criticized the prevailing use of significance tests. Their work has, in turn, come under vigorous attack. The vehemence of the debate may induce

Reviews: The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Cost us Jobs, Justice and Live, the Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse

Deirdre McCloskey and Stephen Ziliak have for some time been conducting a campaign against some economists' almost total reliance on significance tests in their evaluations of statistical analyses.

Science is judgment, not only calculation: a reply to Aris Spanos's review of The cult of statistical significance .

Over the past century the usual (and the conveniently mechanical) procedure devised by the great statistician, geneticist, and racial eugenicist R. A. Fisher has been shown to be scientifically silly

Statistical Significance in the New Tom and the Old Tom: A Reply to Thomas Mayer

Econometricians have been claiming proudly since World War II that significance testing is the empirical side of economics. In fact today most young economists think that the word “empirical” simply

Economic importance and statistical significance: Guidelines for communicating empirical research

Abstract A critical objective for many empirical studies is a thorough evaluation of both substantive importance and statistical significance. Feminist economists have critiqued neoclassical
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 116 REFERENCES

Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics

Is economics a science? Deidre McCloskey says 'Yes, but'. Yes, economics measures and predicts, but - like other sciences - it uses literary methods too. Economists use stories as geologists do, and

How to be Human*: *Though an Economist

In this thoroughly engaging book Deirdre McCloskey puts the "dismal science" under the microscope. She offers advice to young economists, offering models from the old; and she lambastes the

Evaluating significance: comments on "size matters"

Probability, econometrics and truth

When John Maynard Keynes likened Jan Tinbergen's early work in econometrics to black magic and alchemy, he was expressing a widely held view of a new discipline. However, even after half a century of

On theory testing in econometrics : Modeling with nonexperimental data

The Philosophy of Economics: Econometrics as Observation: The Lucas Critique and the Nature of Econometric Inference

Kevin Hoover (1955–) received a D.Phil. in economics from Oxford University after an undergraduate major in philosophy, and his work reflects this dual competence. He has contributed both to

Monetarism and the Methodology of Economics: Essays in Honour of Thomas Mayer

Part 1 Reflections: Thomas Mayer: an appreciation, Kevin D. Hoover and Steven M. Sheffrin getting older, but not much wiser, Thomas Mayer. Part 2 Monetarism: monetarism - the good, the bad and the

Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics

Econometricians would like to project the image of agricultural experimenters who divide a farm into a set of smaller plots of land and who select randomly the level of fertilizer to be used on each

Three attitudes towards data mining

'Data mining' refers to a broad class of activities that have in common, a search over different ways to process or package data statistically or econometrically with the purpose of making the final
...