Sorting , Quotas , and the Civil Rights Act of 1991 : Who Hires When It ’ S Hard to Fire ?

@inproceedings{Oyer2002SortingQ,
  title={Sorting , Quotas , and the Civil Rights Act of 1991 : Who Hires When It ’ S Hard to Fire ?},
  author={Paul E. Oyer},
  year={2002}
}
The Civil Rights Act of 1991 (CRA91) was enacted after a rancorous debate about whether it was a “quota” hiring bill or a necessary means of opening labor markets. We analyze the effects of CRA91 on the composition of firms’ workforces. We consider employer behavior when firms vary in their susceptibility to discrimination suits and when firms can reduce exposure to discrimination claims by employing more protected workers. These forces lead to a sorting effect, which causes firms that are more… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 14 references

The Wage and Employment Effects of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

DeLeire, Thomas
Journal of Human Resources • 2000

Sorting, Quotas, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Who Hires When It’s Hard to Fire?

Oyer, Paul, Schaefer, Scott
Working paper. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University, • 1999

The Impact of Federal Civil Rights Policy on Black Economic Progress: Evidence from the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972.

Chay, Y Kenneth
Industrial and Labor Relations Review • 1998

Enforcement Issues: A Practical Overview.

Nager, D Glen, Broas, M Julia
Louisiana Law Review • 1994

Introduction: A Brief Legislative History of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.

Clegg, Roger
Louisiana Law Review • 1994

“ The Analysis of Interfirm Worker Mobility

S. Henry
Journal of Labor Economics • 1994

Race and the Shifting Burden of Job Displacement: 1982–1993.

Fairlie, W Robert, Kletzer, G Lori
Monthly Labor Review • 1993

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…