Sorry, and not sorry, in Australia: how the apology to the stolen generations buried a history of genocide

  title={Sorry, and not sorry, in Australia: how the apology to the stolen generations buried a history of genocide},
  author={Tony Barta},
  journal={Journal of Genocide Research},
  pages={201 - 214}
  • T. Barta
  • Published 2008
  • Engineering
  • Journal of Genocide Research
Narrating Oppression, Psychosocial Suffering and Survival through the Bush Babies Project
Running title: Dispossession, Social Suffering, and Survival. --- Abstract: Aboriginal people in Australia continue to fare worse across the broad range of social, economic, and health indicators.Expand
Inventing Mental Health First Aid: The Problem of Psychocentrism
This article provides a sociopolitical critique of contemporary Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) discourses. The concept of psychocentrism, adopted as an analytical tool, critiques the problematicExpand
When sorry isn’t good enough: Official remembrance and reconciliation in Australia
When compared with other reconciliation processes, Australian reconciliation and its acts of official remembrance have received relatively little academic attention, and yet the case raises manyExpand
In the shadow of the Australian legend: Re-reading Australian literature
The Australian legend worked as a romantic myth of survival, a foundational grand narrative that legitimised white Australian belonging to the land. The construction of an identity based on the bushExpand
Nostalgia for a Reconciled Future
Catharsis has become a key concept in facilitating the healing of nations and individuals after trauma. It is implicitly required of people who testify before nation-building trials and truthExpand
Theorizing Communication Orientations of Privilege: How White Discourses (De) Construct Australian Aboriginals
We conducted a discourse analysis of Australians' conversations about race, exploring communication that (re)produces and decenters whiteness. We identified 23 communication practices, organized intoExpand
Ontology, sovereignty, legitimacy: two key moments when history curriculum was challenged in public discourse and the curricular effects, Australia 1950s and 2000s
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the ways that history curriculum has worked to legitimise dispossession through narratives that elide questions of Indigenous sovereignty, and whichExpand
Race Relations in Australia: A Brief History
This chapter briefly surveys the history of race relations and the political implications of racism in Australia, highlighting the key moments that shaped the place of race in the country’sExpand