Some weaknesses of a response-strength account of reinforcer effects

@article{Cowie2019SomeWO,
  title={Some weaknesses of a response-strength account of reinforcer effects},
  author={Sarah Cowie},
  journal={European Journal of Behavior Analysis},
  year={2019},
  volume={21},
  pages={348 - 363}
}
  • S. Cowie
  • Published 2 July 2020
  • Psychology
  • European Journal of Behavior Analysis
ABSTRACT The idea that reinforcers control behaviour because they alter behaviour’s strength has been key to both research and practice in behaviour analysis. Yet despite substantial research, the duration, magnitude, and target of reinforcer strengthening is not clearly set out by existing theories of behaviour. In fact, this research has generated more questions than answers, prompting some behaviour analysts to call for novel approaches to understanding the transaction between behaviour and… 

On the “Strength” of Behavior

TLDR
This article reconsiders the concept of response strength for reasons linked to the foundations of a natural science of behavior, and a molar view is suggested as an alternative that accounts for the temporally extended nature of behavior and avoids the perils of a response-strength based approach.

The ontogenetic evolution of verbal behavior

TLDR
The article proposes a framework that helps to understand selection processes in conversations by merging and enhancing Skinner’s work on selection as a cause of behavior change and his work on verbal behavior provides a theoretical basis for placing verbal behavior in an evolutionary framework.

Resistance to extinction versus extinction as discrimination.

  • M. BellW. Baum
  • Psychology
    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
  • 2021
TLDR
It is suggested that the difference in results arises because the multiple-schedule procedure, while including extensive training on stimulus discrimination, includes no training on discrimination between food available and food unavailable, whereas comparable single- and concurrent-Schedule procedures include such training with repeated extinction.

Stimulus control depends on the subjective value of the outcome.

Stimuli that provide information about likely future reinforcers tend to shift behavior, provided a reliable relation between the stimulus and the reinforcer can be discriminated. Stimuli that are

Generalizing from the Past, Choosing the Future

TLDR
This work considers how generalization across various dimensions of an event determines the degree to which the structure of the environment exerts control over behavior.

Assessing human performance during contingency changes and extinction tests in reversal-learning tasks.

Serial reversal-learning procedures are simple preparations that allow for a better understanding of how animals learn about environmental changes, including flexibly shifting responding to adapt to

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 84 REFERENCES

Conditioned reinforcement and response strength.

  • T. Shahan
  • Psychology
    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
  • 2010
TLDR
This paper reviews research on the strengthening effects of conditioned reinforcers within the context of contemporary quantitative choice theories and behavioral momentum theory and explores a signposts or means-to-an-end account that appears to provide a plausible alternative interpretation of the effects of stimuli associated with primary reinforcer.

The power of one reinforcer: The effect of a single reinforcer in the context of shaping.

TLDR
This study demonstrated that a desperation-driven click situation can be reliably produced in a controlled setting and has implications for the understanding of how reinforcement controls behavior.

Control by reinforcers across time and space: A review of recent choice research.

  • S. CowieM. Davison
  • Psychology, Biology
    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
  • 2016
TLDR
It is suggested that organisms may be seen as natural stimulus-correlation detectors so that behavioral change affects the overall correlation and directs the organism toward currently appetitive goals and away from potential aversive goals.

Moving Beyond Reinforcement and Response Strength

TLDR
It is suggested that a potentially useful first step is to work toward formal descriptions of the structure of the predictive relations embodied in common facets of operant behavior (e.g., response-reinforcer contingencies, conditioned reinforcement, and stimulus control).

Direct versus indirect response-reinforcer relationships in teaching autistic children

TLDR
In this experiment three severely autistic children were taught a total of six new target behaviors employing two different response-reinforcer relationships, and the results showed rapid acquisition only when the target behavior was a direct part of the chain leading to the reinforcer.

Behavioral momentum and the Law of Effect

TLDR
Research guided by the momentum metaphor encompasses the effects of reinforcement on response rate, resistance to change, and preference and has implications for clinical interventions, drug addiction, and self-control.

The "supersitition" experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior.

TLDR
The proposed theoretical scheme represents a shift away from hypothetical "laws of learning" toward an interpretation of behavioral change in terms of interaction and competition among tendencies to action according to principles evolved in phylogeny.

Behavioral momentum theory fails to account for the effects of reinforcement rate on resurgence.

TLDR
This model mischaracterizes the effects of reinforcer rates on persistence and resurgence of operant behavior and is inconsistent with the momentum-based model of resurgence.

On the circularity of the law of effect.

Whereas some critics were most concerned with the mechanisms mediating effect, others focussed their attention on the nature of the satisfiers and annoyers to which reference is made in Thorndike's

On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables.

TLDR
A distinction is made between two subclasses of intervening variables, or the authors prefer to say, between ‘intervening variables’ and ‘hypothetical constructs’ which they feel is fundamental but is currently being neglected.
...