Some Tests of the Decay Theory of Immediate Memory

@article{Brown1958SomeTO,
  title={Some Tests of the Decay Theory of Immediate Memory},
  author={John Brown},
  journal={Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology},
  year={1958},
  volume={10},
  pages={12 - 21}
}
  • John Brown
  • Published 1958
  • Psychology
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
The hypothesis of decay of the memory trace as a cause of forgetting has been unpopular. The reasons for this unpopularity are criticized and a theory of the memory span, based on this hypothesis, is put forward. Three experiments which test the hypothesis are described. In each, two kinds of stimuli are presented to the subject, viz., “required” stimuli, which he attempts to remember, and “additional” stimuli, to which he merely makes responses. The first experiment will show that even when… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

On the sources of forgetting in working memory: The test of competing hypotheses
TLDR
The results suggest that it is unwise to aim at identifying a unique source to a complex phenomenon like WM forgetting, as the entire pattern of data is more easily accommodated by the decay-and-refresh hypothesis than by its interference-only contender. Expand
Reconsidering the two-second decay hypothesis in verbal working memory
Abstract A common belief in the study of short-term memory is that the verbal trace decays around two seconds after it is encoded. This belief is typically assumed to follow from the finding that inExpand
Failures of memory and the fate of forgotten memories
TLDR
This review is intended primarily to provide cognitive benchmarks and perhaps a new mindset for behavioral neuroscientists who study memory, with a conclusion that most forgetting is due to retrieval failure as opposed to irreversible erasure of memory. Expand
Time, Memory, and Affect: Experimental Studies of the Subjective Past
A series of studies are reported in which memory, impression formation, and time estimation are shown to be a function of the passage of subjective time. By unobtrusively increasing or decreasing theExpand
Monkey Visual and Auditory Memory
One of the earliest studies of memory (Ebbinghaus, 1895) showed that list memory, when plotted according to the list’s serial position, was U-shaped. Memory was best at the beginning (primacy effect)Expand
Time causes forgetting from working memory
TLDR
The fact that longer processing times had a comparable effect on both verbal and visuospatial memory and the difference between conditions remained stable from the first to the last trials makes it difficult to account for these findings by assuming that forgetting is exclusively due to representation-based interference or buildup of proactive interference. Expand
Overcoming the Negative Consequences of Interference From Recognition Memory Testing
TLDR
The results of the experiment reported here indicate that a release from output interference is obtained when the nature of the items is changed during testing, and supports models of forgetting that assume interference arises from information about the to-be-learned material that is stored in memory. Expand
Auditory and visual interaction in immediate memory.
  • H. Buschke
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Journal of psychiatric research
  • 1962
TLDR
A sampling procedure which utilizes the repetition of any display as the indicator for the S’s responses provides a greater estimate of immediate memory storage than can be obtained by the use of classical recall or reproduction techniques. Expand
Need probability affects retention: A direct demonstration
TLDR
The results of the present experiments indicated that the shape of the need-probability curve influenced the slope of the retention curve and that the effect became larger as the experimental session progressed, supporting the notion that memory adapts to need probabilities. Expand
Forgetting from working memory: does novelty encoding matter?
TLDR
It is concluded that, contrary to the SOB model, the novelty of distractors plays no role per se in forgetting, and recall performance should be better in complex span tasks in which distractors are repeated than in task in which every distractor is novel. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 REFERENCES
Interference and forgetting.
TLDR
There is a general agreement that interference among tasks must produce a sizable proportion of forgetting and that most forgetting must be a function of the learning of tasks which interfere with that which has already been learned. Expand
Decay Theory of Immediate Memory
TLDR
In the course of a study relevant to the memory requirements for using telephone dials, an experiment was carried out which would seem to provide unambiguous support for the decay theory of recall. Expand
The Nature of Set-to-Learn and of Intra-Material Interference in Immediate Memory
The influence of set on learning has previously been demonstrated under conditions where set could affect either the selection of stimuli in perception or their subsequent rehearsal. With both theseExpand
The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.
TLDR
The theory provides us with a yardstick for calibrating the authors' stimulus materials and for measuring the performance of their subjects, and the concepts and measures provided by the theory provide a quantitative way of getting at some of these questions. Expand
Distortions in Immediate Memory
A series of five pairs of abstract geometrical figures were presented to each subject. Unknown to the subjects, the members of each pair were identical. The second member was presented 10 secondsExpand
Immediate Memory and Simultaneous Stimuli
When two sets of digits are presented simultaneously one to one ear and one to the other, the subject may be asked to write them down from immediate memory beginning with those on an ear chosen byExpand
Successive Responses to Simultaneous Stimuli
Previous work had shown that, when a memory-span experiment is performed with half the items presented to one ear, and half simultaneously to the other, a certain order of response appears. EitherExpand
Principles of Gestalt Psychology.
When I first conceived the plan of writing this book I guessed, though I did not know, how much effort it would cost to carry it out, and what demands it would put on a potential reader. And IExpand
Principles Of Gestalt Psychology
Routledge is now re-issuing this prestigious series of 204 volumes originally published between 1910 and 1965. The titles include works by key figures such asC.G. Jung, Sigmund Freud, Jean Piaget,Expand
A Quantitative Study of the Similarity Factor in Retroactive Inhibition
Resume Les etudes anterieures de l'inhibition retroactive ont montre que des activites interpolees entre l'apprentissage et le rappel empěchent ce rappel. Le degre de cet empěchement varie avecExpand
...
1
2
3
...