Corpus ID: 12523868

Some Guidelines for the Critical Reviewing of Conceptual Papers *

@inproceedings{Senior2008SomeGF,
  title={Some Guidelines for the Critical Reviewing of Conceptual Papers *},
  author={A. Senior},
  year={2008}
}
  • A. Senior
  • Published 2008
  • * I am deeply indebted to Heinz Klein for the many discussions we had on critical paper reviewing. His thoughts and ideas significantly helped shape this article. I would also like to thank Kalle Lyytinen, Jeff Parsons, Juhani Iivari, and Frank Land for their numerous comments and suggestions. am often asked about the section; in particular about the kinds of papers that are or are not appropriate, how we decide what is and is not appropriate, and, specifically, how we evaluate the submissions… CONTINUE READING
    On Writing and Reviewing…
    Viewpoint: Information systems research strategy
    Social Information Systems: Review, Framework, and Research Agenda
    • 29
    • PDF
    Why Are Papers Desk Rejected at PAJAIS?: A Practical Guide to Avoiding Rejection

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES
    How to review a paper.
    • 141
    • PDF
    Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions
    • 4,147
    • PDF
    A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems
    • 5,163
    • PDF
    Research Commentary: Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research
    • 440
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline
    • 382
    • PDF
    A Program for Research on Management Information Systems
    • 838
    Nothing At The Center?: Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field
    • 264
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    The uses of argument
    • 4,927
    A Framework for Research in Computer-Based Management Information Systems
    • 517
    Reviewing a manuscript for publication
    • 52
    • PDF