Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis*

  • Ahmed M.Abou-Setta, Hesham G.Al-Inany, Ragaa T.Mansour, Gamal I.Serour, Mohamed A.Aboulghar
  • Published 2005

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The true impact of the embryo transfer catheter choice on an IVF programme has not been fully examined. We therefore decided to systematically review the evidence provided in the literature so that we may evaluate a single variable in relation to a successful transfer, the firmness of the embryo transfer catheter. METHODS: An extensive computerized search was conducted for all relevant articles published as full text, or abstracts, and critically appraised. In addition, a hand search was undertaken to locate any further trials. RESULTS: A total of 23 randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the types of embryo transfer catheters were identified. Only ten of these trials, including 4141 embryo transfers, compared soft versus firm embryo catheters. Pooling of the results demonstrated a statistically significantly increased chance of clinical pregnancy following embryo transfer using the soft (643/2109) versus firm (488/2032) catheters [P=0.01; odds ratio (OR)=1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.08–1.79]. When only the truly RCT were analysed, the results were again still in favour of using the soft embryo transfer catheters [soft (432/1403) versus firm (330/1402)], but with a greater significance (P < 0.00001; OR=1.49, 95% CI = 1.26–1.77). CONCLUSION: Using soft embryo transfer catheters for embryo transfer results in a significantly higher pregnancy rate as compared to firm catheters.

5 Figures and Tables

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{MAbouSetta2005SoftVF, title={Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis*}, author={Ahmed M.Abou-Setta and Hesham G.Al-Inany and Ragaa T.Mansour and Gamal I.Serour and Mohamed A.Aboulghar}, year={2005} }