Sociologist fools physics judges

@article{Giles2006SociologistFP,
  title={Sociologist fools physics judges},
  author={Jim Giles},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2006},
  volume={442},
  pages={8-8}
}
  • J. Giles
  • Published 5 July 2006
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Nature
But do social scientists understand science? 

Paper Mentions

The Role of the Sociologist after half-a-century of studying science
I was a pretty happy academic until I bumped into two South Africans in 1998. I’m not going to give them all the blame but they certainly played a part in my becoming an unhappy sociologist. TheyExpand
Interactional Imogen: language, practice and the body
Here I try to improve on the available answers to certain long-debated questions and set out some consequences for the answers. Are there limits to the extent to which we can understand theExpand
Shaun Gallagher Moral Agency, Self-Consciousness,
This paper argues that self-consciousness and moral agency depend crucially on both embodied and social aspects of human existence, and that the capacity for practical wisdom, phronesis, is centralExpand
A thousand words is worth a picture
In this response to Ribeiro and Lima’s paper on interactional expertise, we argue that, by not incorporating the insights of constructivist social science, their analysis goes backwards rather thanExpand
How Does Science Fit into Society? The Fractal Model
According to Studies of Expertise and Experience (SEE), expertise is socialisation into an expert domain. Society consists of many expert domains of different extent, some small and esoteric, some,Expand
Are Experts Right or are They Members of Expert Groups?
ABSTRACT I describe an approach to the meaning of expertise that grows out of sociological approaches to the analysis of science such as ‘sociology of scientific knowledge’. This approach wasExpand
Keeping the collectivity in mind?
The key question in this three way debate is the role of the collectivity and of agency. Collins and Shrager debate whether cognitive psychology has, like the sociology of knowledge, always taken theExpand
Rethinking Moral Expertise
TLDR
An account of expertise that draws on the role of tacit knowledge in order to provide a basis upon which the debate on whether moral philosophers can be said to be ‘moral experts’ is offered, which permits the argument to be made that moral philosophers could be considered specialist members of an expert community of moral decision-makers. Expand
The Sociology of Expertise: The Distribution of Social Fluency
Expert knowledge is an essential component of modern society. It is also a potentially difficult topic for sociology because of the importance sociology attaches to culture and context. The sociologyExpand
The locus of legitimate interpretation in Big Data sciences: Lessons for computational social science from -omic biology and high-energy physics
This paper argues that analyses of the ways in which Big Data has been enacted in other academic disciplines can provide us with concepts that will help understand the application of Big Data toExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...