Social observation increases deontological judgments in moral dilemmas

  title={Social observation increases deontological judgments in moral dilemmas},
  author={Minwoo Lee and Sunhae Sul and Hackjin Kim},
  journal={Evolution and Human Behavior},

Figures from this paper

Many heads are more utilitarian than one
Moral judgments have a very prominent social nature, and in everyday life, they are continually shaped by discussions with others. Psychological investigations of these judgments, however, have
Influence of Self-Relevance and Reputational Concerns on Altruistic Moral Decision Making
Results suggested that moral principle guiding interpersonal moral decision making observed in the study is best described as an egoistically biased altruism, and that reputational concerns can play a key role in restraining selfish tendency.
Revisiting the divide between deontology and utilitarianism in moral dilemma judgment: A multinomial modeling approach.
Present research suggests that the split between norms and "consequences" as determinants of judgment is artificial, and suggests that, ultimately, viewing dilemma judgments through a consequentialist lens may be a useful approach for advancing theoretical development in the field of dilemma research.
Priming Intuition Disfavors Instrumental Harm But Not Impartial Beneficence
Understanding the cognitive underpinnings of moral judgment is one of most pressing problems in psychological science. Some highly-cited studies suggest that reliance on intuition decreases
An Asymmetric Effect: Physical and Simulated Confederate's Mere Presence Induce a Preference for Deontological Over Utilitarian Judgment.
People may behave differently in a shared physical context due to the mere presence of others. The study examined whether individual moral judgments were subject to the confederate's presence.
The cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying norm-enforcement behaviors under social observation
Findings indicated that the increase of norm-enforcement behaviors in the UG under social observation was more than a behavioral strategy for social desirability, but a result of enhanced sensitivity to fairness norm violations and unfairness-related negative feelings.
Increased Conformity to Social Hierarchy Under Public Eyes
The findings suggest that the motivation to make better impressions on people of higher social status can be the major driver of conformity to others with higher social positions.
Coronavirus Ethics: Judgments of Market Ethics in a Pandemic
COVID-19 has required major changes in behavior and created significant health and economic concerns for many individuals. In this context, we have explored ethical judgments as part of a larger


Gender Differences in Responses to Moral Dilemmas
The findings suggest that gender differences in moral dilemma judgments are due to differences in affective responses to harm rather than cognitive evaluations of outcomes.
Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
The current research applied Jacoby's (1991) process dissociation procedure to independently quantify the strength of deontological and utilitarian inclinations within individuals, providing evidence for the independent contributions of de ontological andilitarian inclinations to moral judgments.
The Adaptive Utility of Deontology: Deontological Moral Decision-Making Fosters Perceptions of Trust and Likeability
Although various motives underlie moral decision-making, recent research suggests that deontological moral decision-making may have evolved, in part, to communicate trustworthiness to conspecifics,
Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.
It is shown that people who make characteristically deontological judgments are preferred as social partners, perceived as more moral and trustworthy, and are trusted more in economic games, providing empirical support for a partner choice account of moral intuitions.
You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation.
Results showed that global evaluations were better predicted by morality than by sociability or competence-trait ascriptions, and showed that the effect of moral traits on group global evaluations was mediated by the perception of threat.
Manipulations of Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgment
The proposed dual-process model of moral judgment suggests another unexamined route by which choice might be influenced: contextual sensitivity of affect.
Integrative Moral Judgment: Dissociating the Roles of the Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex
Findings support the hypothesis that the amygdala provides an affective assessment of the action in question, whereas the vmPFC integrates that signal with a utilitarian assessment of expected outcomes to yield “all things considered” moral judgments.