Social media governance: can social media companies motivate voluntary rule following behavior among their users?

@article{Tyler2019SocialMG,
  title={Social media governance: can social media companies motivate voluntary rule following behavior among their users?},
  author={Tom R. Tyler and Matt Katsaros and Tracey Meares and Sudhir Alladi Venkatesh},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Criminology},
  year={2019},
  volume={17},
  pages={109-127}
}
Objectives The purpose of these studies is to examine whether the procedural justice of a social media platform enforcement system for content moderation shapes offenders' post-message takedown recidivism rates. Methods Users whose posts have been removed from the platform (taken down) for rule violations evaluate the justice of the platform enforcement procedure. The impact of those evaluations upon subsequent rule violations is measured. In addition, in study 2, users are randomly assigned to… 
Common sense or censorship: How algorithmic moderators and message type influence perceptions of online content deletion
Hateful content online is a concern for social media platforms, policymakers, and the public. This has led high-profile content platforms, such as Facebook, to adopt algorithmic content-moderation
Commercial Versus Volunteer: Comparing User Perceptions of Toxicity and Transparency in Content Moderation Across Social Media Platforms
Content moderation is a critical service performed by a variety of people on social media, protecting users from offensive or harmful content by reviewing and removing either the content or the
Reconsidering Tweets: Intervening During Tweet Creation Decreases Offensive Content
TLDR
It is concluded that interventions allowing users to reconsider their comments can be an effective mechanism for reducing offensive content online.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES
What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures.
This paper examines procedural justice in the context of citizen experiences with the police and courts. It is based on interviews of 652 citizens with recent personal experiences involving those
Procedural Justice in Resolving Family Conflict: Implications for Youth Violence Prevention
The fairness of our legal system is often judged by individuals and the public at large along dimensions of procedural and distributive justice. People seem to care about how legal decisions are made
Bounded Authority: Expanding “Appropriate” Police Behavior Beyond Procedural Justice
This paper expands previous conceptualizations of appropriate police behavior beyond procedural justice. The focus of the current study is on the notion of bounded authority—that is, acting within
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization
TLDR
Results from a randomized controlled trial of political mobilization messages delivered to 61 million Facebook users during the 2010 US congressional elections show that the messages directly influenced political self-expression, information seeking and real-world voting behaviour of millions of people.
Popular Legitimacy and the Exercise of Legal Authority: Motivating Compliance, Cooperation and Engagement
The traditional goal of legal authorities has been to obtain widespread public compliance with the law. Empirical research findings have shown that legitimacy—typically operationalized as the
Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives.
TLDR
The results showed that justice-performance relationships were mediated by positive and negative affect, with the relevant affect dimension varying across justice and performance variables, and the merit in integrating the social exchange and affect lenses in future research is discussed.
The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States
  • T. Tyler, P. A. Goff, R. MacCoun
  • Medicine, Political Science
    Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society
  • 2015
TLDR
These findings demonstrate that legal authorities gain by a focus on legitimacy, providing legal authorities with a clear road map of strategies for creating and maintaining public trust.
Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions?
  • T. Tyler
  • Medicine
    Behavioral sciences & the law
  • 2001
TLDR
This article presents an alternative procedural justice based model that links public trust and confidence to views about the manner in which legal authorities treat the public and suggests suggestions about the elements of procedures that are central to public judgments about their fairness.
The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract The correlates of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice were examined using 190 studies samples, totaling 64,757 participants. We found the distinction between the three
Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: The Benefits of Self-Regulation
In this lecture I argue for the value of a self-regulatory approach to law and criminal justice. I do so by first describing and critiquing the dominant approach to regulation in use today:
...
1
2
3
4
...