Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation.

@article{Rand2014SocialHS,
  title={Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation.},
  author={David G. Rand and Alexander Peysakhovich and Gordon T Kraft-Todd and George E. Newman and Owen Wurzbacher and Martin A. Nowak and Joshua D. Greene},
  journal={Nature communications},
  year={2014},
  volume={5},
  pages={
          3677
        }
}
Cooperation is central to human societies. Yet relatively little is known about the cognitive underpinnings of cooperative decision making. Does cooperation require deliberate self-restraint? Or is spontaneous prosociality reined in by calculating self-interest? Here we present a theory of why (and for whom) intuition favors cooperation: cooperation is typically advantageous in everyday life, leading to the formation of generalized cooperative intuitions. Deliberation, by contrast, adjusts… 

Contextualised strong reciprocity explains selfless cooperation despite selfish intuitions and weak social heuristics

It is shown that preferences, coupled with beliefs, successfully predict the high levels of cooperation in both maintenance and provision dilemmas, and advances the Contextualised Strong Reciprocity account as a unifying framework and considers its implications for research and policy.

Social setting, intuition and experience in laboratory experiments interact to shape cooperative decision-making

It is found that promoting intuition versus deliberation has no effect on cooperative behavior among inexperienced subjects living in a non-cooperative setting and experienced subjects cooperate more than inexperienced subjects, but only under time pressure.

Experience with anonymous interactions reduces intuitive cooperation

It is found that cooperative habits can be overturned in one-shot anonymous interactions, when people learn that defection will not damage their self-interest.

Intuition, Deliberation, and Cooperation: Further Meta-Analytic Evidence from 91 Experiments on Pure Cooperation

What is the role of intuitive versus deliberative cognitive processing in human cooperation? The Social Heuristics Hypothesis (SHH) stipulates that (i) intuition favors behaviors that are typically

Cooperation, Fast and Slow

This theory predicts that deliberation will undermine pure cooperation but not strategic cooperation, and reveals 17.3% more pure cooperation when intuition was promoted over deliberation, but no significant difference in strategic cooperation between more intuitive and more deliberative conditions.

Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation

An evolutionary game-theoretic model of dual-process agents playing prisoner’s dilemma games finds that, across many types of environments, evolution only ever favors agents who always intuitively defect or are intuitively predisposed to cooperate but who, when deliberating, switch to defection if it is in their self-interest to do so.

Social setting, intuition, and experience in lab experiments interact to shape cooperative decision-making

It is found that promoting intuition versus deliberation has no effect on cooperative behavior among inexperienced subjects living in a non-cooperative setting and experienced subjects cooperate more than inexperienced subjects, but only under time pressure.

Humans display a 'cooperative phenotype' that is domain general and temporally stable.

There is a domain-general and temporally stable inclination towards paying costs to benefit others, which is dubbed the 'cooperative phenotype', and it is found that cooperation is not correlated with norm-enforcing punishment or non-competitiveness.

Why We Cooperate

A key element of human morality is prosocial behavior. Humans are unique among animals in their willingness to pay costs to benefit unrelated friends and strangers. This cooperation is a critical

Time Pressure Increases Cooperation in Competitively Framed Social Dilemmas

The results suggest that participants' intuitions favor cooperation rather than norm compliance, and also that simply changing the framing of the Public Goods Game is enough to make it appear novel to participants and thus to restore the time pressure effect.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 77 REFERENCES

Spontaneous giving and calculated greed

The cognitive basis of cooperative decision-making in humans using a dual-process framework is explored and it is proposed that cooperation is intuitive because cooperative heuristics are developed in daily life where cooperation is typically advantageous.

A Model of Human Cooperation in Social Dilemmas

The key innovation of this article is to postulate that humans have attitude to cooperation by nature and consequently they do not act a priori as single agents, as assumed by standard economic models, but they forecast how a social dilemma would evolve if they formed coalitions and then they act according to their most optimistic forecast.

The Origins of Human Cooperation

This work seeks an explanation of cooperation that works for humans, but does not work for other species, or works substantially less well, and is based on a plausible evolutionary dynamic involving some combination of genetic and cultural elements.

Human cooperation

Habits of Virtue: Creating Norms of Cooperation and Defection in the Laboratory

These findings help to explain variation in one-shot anonymous cooperation, linking this intrinsically motivated prosociality to the externally imposed institutional rules experienced in other settings.

Altruistic punishment in humans

It is shown experimentally that the altruistic punishment of defectors is a key motive for the explanation of cooperation, and that future study of the evolution of human cooperation should include a strong focus on explaining altruistic punished.

Are Social Preferences Skin Deep? Dictators under Cognitive Load

We study the impact of cognitive load in dictator games to test two conflicting views of moral behavior. Are social preferences skindeep in the sense that they are the result of humans’ cognitive

Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude

  • M. NowakS. Roch
  • Economics
    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  • 2006
It is shown that upstream reciprocity alone does not lead to the evolution of cooperation, but it can evolve and increase the level of cooperation if it is linked to either direct or spatial reciprocity.

Spontaneous Altruism by Chimpanzees and Young Children

Experimental evidence that chimpanzees perform basic forms of helping in the absence of rewards spontaneously and repeatedly toward humans and conspecifics is reported, indicating that chimpanzees share crucial aspects of altruism with humans and suggesting that the roots of human altruism may go deeper than previous experimental evidence suggested.
...