Corpus ID: 142477022

Social Exclusion in a Mental Health Court

@inproceedings{MacDonald2015SocialEI,
  title={Social Exclusion in a Mental Health Court},
  author={Sue-Ann Belle MacDonald and Audrey Michaud},
  year={2015}
}
This article is based on a study, inspired by institutional ethnographic methods, of a mental health court (MHC) situated in Montreal, Canada. The focus of this article is on the qualitative results of the project, namely, the perceptions and experiences of accused (N=20) who were involved in the court as well as key actors (N=10) who make up the multidisciplinary team. In addition, findings from participant observation and a quantitative review of court files are drawn upon to flesh out the… Expand

Figures from this paper

Connectedness in Recovery Narratives of Persons Labeled Not Criminally Responsible: A Qualitative Study
Abstract Objective Connectedness is placed at the heart of the recovery process in mental health care. However, in regard to persons labeled not criminally responsible (NCR), considerations ofExpand
Judiciarization of people suffering from mental illness: A critical analysis of the psychiatric-judicial interface.
TLDR
Current trends suggest that PSMIs are often over-represented in these systems, and this over-representation is, in part, due to a growing phenomenon known as the judiciarization of the mentally ill. Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 62 REFERENCES
Seattle's mental health courts: early indicators of effectiveness.
TLDR
Empirical evidence of the effectiveness of MHCs has been very limited and benchmarks from which different court decisions can be derived are very limited. Expand
More of the same? Treatment in mental health courts.
TLDR
The research found that mental health court participation increased the frequency of outpatient treatment, but that social services and treatment specialized to address criminal risk factors were uncommon both at the baseline and at the 6-month follow-up. Expand
Law & psychiatry: what can we say about mental health courts today?
TLDR
Despite the success of MHCs, they are not a substitute for an adequate mental health system and it is preferable that people with mental illness not become involved in the criminal justice system in the first place. Expand
What Factors Work in Mental Health Court? A Consumer Perspective
TLDR
Although social support was not associated with outcomes quantitatively, social support emerged as a salient theme in the qualitative analysis and was estimated to be a key factor in recovery and recidivism. Expand
Stakeholder views of a mental health court.
TLDR
The observations of stakeholders revealed important themes to consider in research evaluating mental health courts, including selection mechanisms, supervision processes, treatment access, use of sanctions, competency, indicators of effectiveness, participant characteristics associated with better or worse outcomes, and mechanisms of change. Expand
Mental health courts: serving justice and promoting recovery.
TLDR
There is a call for more empirical research to understand the connection between societal views of mental illness and the legal system, as well as the framework of the Circuit Court 'split' regarding the Constitutional rights of persons committed to state mental health institutions. Expand
“’Cause Everybody Likes to Be Treated Good”
There is mounting evidence that mental health courts (MHCs) reduce criminal recidivism and increase use of mental health services. Although not yet empirically tested, procedural justice has beenExpand
Mental illness, crime, and violence: Risk, context, and social control
In this article, I review theory and research on the relationship between mental illness, crime, and violence. I begin by discussing the larger backdrop of deinstitutionalization of mental illnessExpand
Mental health courts and diversion programs: A global survey.
  • R. Schneider
  • Medicine
  • International journal of law and psychiatry
  • 2010
TLDR
A distillation of the commonalities from jurisdictions suggests that providing the police with better options at first instance (pre-arrest diversion), broader discretion on the part of the prosecutor ( pre-plea diversion), and greater jurisdiction on the parts of the courts (to impose treatment and monitoring) may have provided those jurisdictions with an adequately functioning system. Expand
A public health perspective on violent offenses among persons with mental illness.
TLDR
The hypothesis that people with mental and substance use disorders are not major contributors to police-identified criminal violence is supported and public perceptions of mentally ill persons as criminally dangerous appear to be greatly exaggerated. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...