Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method

@article{Sidanius2004SocialDT,
  title={Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method},
  author={J. Sidanius and F. Pratto and C. V. Laar and S. Levin},
  journal={Political Psychology},
  year={2004},
  volume={25},
  pages={845-880}
}
The theory has been misconstrued in four primary ways, which are often expressed as the claims of psychological reductionism, conceptual redundancy, biological reductionism, and hierarchy justification. This paper addresses these claims and suggests how social dominance theory builds on and moves beyond social identity theory and system justification theory. 
History, prejudice, and the study of social inequities.
Contrasting Theoretical Approaches to Intergroup Relations
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 204 REFERENCES
Why social dominance theory has been falsified.
The Social Psychological Approach
...
1
2
3
4
5
...