Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method

@article{Sidanius2004SocialDT,
  title={Social Dominance Theory: Its Agenda and Method},
  author={J. Sidanius and F. Pratto and C. V. Laar and S. Levin},
  journal={Political Psychology},
  year={2004},
  volume={25},
  pages={845-880}
}
The theory has been misconstrued in four primary ways, which are often expressed as the claims of psychological reductionism, conceptual redundancy, biological reductionism, and hierarchy justification. This paper addresses these claims and suggests how social dominance theory builds on and moves beyond social identity theory and system justification theory. 
429 Citations
History, prejudice, and the study of social inequities.
  • 1
Contrasting Theoretical Approaches to Intergroup Relations
  • 106
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 204 REFERENCES
Why social dominance theory has been falsified.
  • 100
A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo
  • 1,929
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
The Social Psychological Approach
  • 22
...
1
2
3
4
5
...