Social Discounting

@article{Jones2006SocialD,
  title={Social Discounting},
  author={Bryan A. Jones and Howard Rachlin},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2006},
  volume={17},
  pages={283 - 286}
}
The amount of money a person was willing to forgo in order to give $75 to another person decreased as a hyperbolic function of the perceived social distance between them. Similar hyperbolic functions have previously been shown to describe both time and probability discounting. 

Figures from this paper

Reciprocal Discounting: A Pilot Study
Altruistic choice can be described quantitatively by social discount functions that indicate how rewards decrease in value with increases in social distance. Reciprocation from others has been
Social Discounting and Delay Discounting
Social discounting was measured as the amount of money a participant was willing to forgo to give a fixed amount (usually $75) to another person. In the first experiment, amount forgone was a
Delay, probability, and social discounting in a public goods game.
TLDR
Steepness of discounting correlated, across participants, among all three discount dimensions, however, only social and probability discounting were correlated with the public-good contribution; high public- good contributors were more altruistic and also less risk averse than low contributors.
Social discounting and the prisoner's dilemma game.
TLDR
It is proposed that people do value rewards to others, albeit at a discounted rate (social discounting), in a manner similar to discounting of delayed rewards (delay discounting).
Future altruism: Social discounting of delayed rewards
Selfless giving
TLDR
It is shown that people who anticipate more personal change over time give more to others, and support for the hypothesis is found in three studies using incentive-compatible charitable donation decisions and one involving hypothetical choices about sharing with loved ones.
Inequality aversion, social discount, and time discount rates
Purpose - We conduct a hypothetical dictator game with social distance and time delays using conjoint analysis. Design / methodology / approach - Responses from 1,347 Japanese adults are collected
Social Discounting under Risk
TLDR
The data show that independent of risk, participants are less eager to forego money and exhibit more selfishness toward a specific person when the social distance increases; these findings are reflected in the hyperbolic model.
Sharing Personal Information is Discounted as a Function of Social Distance
Social discounting researchers have repeatedly shown that individuals discount sharing the amount of a monetary reward as a function of social distance, and that increasing the available monetary
A ratio scale for social distance.
TLDR
A psychophysical distance function obtained via magnitude estimation (Stevens, 1956) is used and it is shown how they may be used to rescale ordinal to ratio social discount functions.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES
Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting.
TLDR
By measuring discounting at an unprecedented range of real rewards, this study has systematically replicated the robust finding in human delay discounting research that discount rates decrease with increasing magnitude of reward.
A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.
TLDR
The present effort illustrates the value of studying choice involving both delayed and probabilistic outcomes within a general discounting framework that uses similar experimental procedures and a common analytical approach.
Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers.
TLDR
Two studies compared participants, distinguished by their typical alcohol consumption, on the degree to which they discounted the value of delayed, hypothetical amounts of money, finding that a hyperbolic function described temporal discounting more accurately than an exponential function.
Social Utility and Decision Making in Interpersonal Contexts
Three studies examined preferences for outcomes to self and a codisputant. Studies I and 2 estimated social utility functions from judgments of satisfaction with alternative outcomes. Comparing
Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison
In this study, children, young adults, and older adults chose between immediate and delayed hypothetical monetary rewards The amount of the delayed reward was held constant while its delay was varied
Altruism and selfishness
  • H. Rachlin
  • Psychology, Economics
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • 2002
TLDR
Altruism, like self-control, is a valuable temporally-extended pattern of behavior that may be learned and maintained over an individual's lifetime and needs no special inherited mechanism.
Commitment, choice and self-control.
  • H. Rachlin, L. Green
  • Psychology, Biology
    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
  • 1972
TLDR
The preference for the large delayed alternative with long durations of T parallels everyday instances of advance commitment to a given course of action and may be seen as a prototype for self-control.
The Science of Self-Control
This book proposes a new science of self-control based on the principles of behavioral psychology and economics. Claiming that insight and self-knowledge are insufficient for controlling one's
Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.
TLDR
This work has shown that impulsiveness seems to be best accounted for by the hyberbolic curves that have been found to describe the decline in effectiveness of rewards as the rewards are delayed from the time of choice.
...
...