Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change

  title={Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change},
  author={M. Haigh and Jeffrey S. Wood and A. Stewart},
  journal={Memory \& Cognition},
Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) of the form if A, then C describe an initial proposal (A) and a predicted, undesirable consequence of this proposal (C) (e.g., “If cannabis is ever legalized, then eventually cocaine will be legalized, too”). Despite SSAs being a common rhetorical device, there has been surprisingly little empirical research into their subjective evaluation and perception. Here, we present evidence that SSAs are interpreted as a form of consequentialist argument, inviting… Expand
Slipping on Slippery Slope Arguments
This paper identifies several types of mechanisms leading to slippery slopes in real-life contexts to demonstrate that both the strength of SSAs and the justifiability of using SSAs are best assessed on a case-by-case basis. Expand
Argument Quality in Real World Argumentation
  • U. Hahn
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • 2020
This article describes recent developments in providing such measures as argument strength in a way that tracks an objective relationship with truth and not just mere persuasiveness. Expand
When Trust Matters: The Case of Gun Control
Declining trust in government is often cited as the cause of declining support for policies that require ideological sacrifices. Yet pivotal to the effect of trust is the broader political context,Expand
Denying Assisted Dying Where Death is Not ‘Reasonably Foreseeable’: Intolerable Overgeneralization in Canadian End-of-Life Law
The recent change in Canadian law to allow access to medical assistance in dying restricts eligibility, among its other criteria, to those for whom “natural death has become reasonably foreseeable.”Expand
Abortion and multifetal pregnancy reduction: An ethical comparison
Translator’s note This translation has been made by author Barra having proof-read an automatic translation of the Norwegian language version published in The Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics/Etikk IExpand
Abort og fosterreduksjon: En etisk sammenligning
De siste årene har fosterreduksjon i økende grad vært gjenstand for debatt i Norge, og intensiteten nådde et foreløpig maksimum da Lovavdelingen leverte tolkningsuttalelsen § 2 Tolkning av abortlovenExpand


The psychological mechanism of the slippery slope argument
Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) have a bad philosophical reputation. They seem, however, to be widely used and frequently accepted in many legal, political, and ethical contexts. Hahn and OaksfordExpand
Persuading and Dissuading by Conditional Argument.
Abstract Informal reasoning typically draws on a wider range of inferential behaviour than is measured by traditional inference tasks. In this paper, we developed several tasks to study informalExpand
The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
Classical informal reasoning "fallacies," for example, begging the question or arguing from ignorance, while ubiquitous in everyday argumentation, have been subject to little systematic investigationExpand
When can we say ‘if’?
This study focuses on the conditions which permit people to assert a conditional statement of the form 'if p then q' with conversational relevance, suggesting that such conditionals may best be asserted when they are of high relevance to the goals of the listener. Expand
The Basic Slippery Slope Argument
Although studies have yielded a detailed taxonomy of types of slippery slope arguments, they have failed to identify a basic argumentation scheme that applies to all. Therefore, there is no way ofExpand
Experimental Pragmatics: a Gricean turn in the study of language
This work begins by highlighting Paul Grice's contributions to ordinary language philosophy and shows how it has led to this active area of experimental investigation, before focusing on two exemplary phenomena--'scalar inference' and 'reference resolution'--before considering other topics that fit into the paradigm known as 'experimental pragmatics'. Expand
The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.
Current investigators of words, sentences, and other language materials almost never provide statistical evidence that their findings generalize beyond the specific sample of language materials theyExpand
Conditional sentences create a blind spot in theory of mind during narrative comprehension.
We identify a blind spot in the early Theory of Mind processing of conditional sentences that describe a protagonist's potential action, and its predictable consequences. We propose that suchExpand
The Camel's Nose is in the Tent: Rules, Theories and Slippery Slopes
Slippery slopes have been the topic of a spate of recent literature. In this Article, the authors provide a general theory for understanding and evaluating slippery slope arguments (SSAs) and theirExpand
Consequential conditionals: invited and suppressed inferences from valued outcomes.
This work shows that desirable (viz. undesirable) outcomes invite an inference to the truth of their antecedent, and shows that the more extreme the outcome is, the stronger the invited inference is. Expand