Slippery Slope Arguments

  title={Slippery Slope Arguments},
  author={Anneli Jefferson},
  journal={Philosophy Compass},
  • A. Jefferson
  • Published 1 October 2014
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy Compass
Slippery slope arguments are frequently dismissed as fallacious or weak arguments but are nevertheless commonly used in political and bioethical debates. This paper gives an overview of different variants of the argument commonly found in the literature and addresses their argumentative strength and the interrelations between them. The most common variant, the empirical slippery slope argument, predicts that if we do A, at some point the highly undesirable B will follow. I discuss both the… 
On Slippery Slopes
Abstract I here discuss an argument frequently dismissed as a fallacy – the slippery slope or camel's nose. The argument has three forms – analogical, argumentative, and prudential. None of these
Confabulation, Rationalisation and Morality
In everyday confabulation and rationalisation of behaviour, agents provide sincerely believed explanations of behaviour which are ill-grounded and normally inaccurate. In this paper, I look at the
University of Birmingham Confabulation , rationalisation and morality
In everyday confabulation and rationalisation of behaviour, agents provide sincerely believed explanations of behaviour which are ill-grounded and normally inaccurate. In this paper, I look at the
Normalizing Surveillance
This essay explains what normalization means in the context of surveillance concerns and clarifies why normalization has significant governance consequences and helps privacy scholars and activists better integrate supporting evidence to counter skepticism.
Ethical guidelines for deliberately infecting volunteers with COVID-19
It may be possible to maintain current ethical standards yet still permit human challenge trials in a context where delay is critical and the implications are that regulators and researchers need to work together now to design robust but short trials and streamline ethics approval processes so that they are in place when applications for trials are made.
Amazon’s Ring: Surveillance as a Slippery Slope Service
The goal is to document activist criticism and provide further conceptual justification for the research trajectory of what Frank Pasquale (2019) calls the ‘second wave of algorithmic accountability’.
How to Argue with Questions and Answers: Argumentation Strategies in Parliamentary Deliberation
  • C. Ilie
  • Political Science
  • 2022
While apparently designed to request information, parliamentary questions are the most challenging and face-threatening acts, used argumentatively by opposition members of parliament (MPs) to


What's Wrong with Slippery Slope Arguments?
  • T. Govier
  • Philosophy
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy
  • 1982
Slippery slope arguments are commonly thought to be fallacious. But is there a single fallacy which they all commit? A study of applied logic texts reveals competing diagnoses of the supposed error,
Slippery Slope Arguments and Legal Reasoning
Slippery slope arguments pervade the legal discourse. Such arguments generally hold that we should resist a particular practice or policy, either on the grounds that allowing it could lead us to
The great slippery-slope argument.
Although there are slippery-slope arguments that are sound and convincing, typical formulations of the Nazi-invoking argument are found to be seriously deficient both in logical rigour and in the social history and psychology required as a scholarly underpinning.
Intertemporal Disagreement and Empirical Slippery Slope Arguments
This article delineates a subset of slippery slope arguments against which my objection may be decisive, considers how the proponents of such arguments may evade my objection by adding further premises, and examines the likely plausibility of these additional premises.
Once You Start Using Slippery Slope Arguments, You`re on a Very Slippery Slope
Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) are, so I argue, arguments from consequences which have the following peculiar characteristic: They take advantage of our being less than perfect in making-and acting
Consequentialism, Complacency, and Slippery Slope Arguments
This paper argues that consequentialists' complacency in meeting the relevant empirical justificatory burden remains much the same, and defends the consequentialist claim that the authors' current practises of partiality in fact maximise the good, impartially conceived.
Mechanisms of the Slippery Slope
We've all made plenty of slippery slope arguments in our day, and we've all pooh-poohed plenty. Do these arguments make sense, and, if so, when? This article tries to go behind the metaphor of the
The Slippery Slope Argument
In public debates about the introduction of new technologies or about legalization of abortion, euthanasia, or HIV tests, an ever-recurrent argument is the slippery slope or wedge argument. It has
The Camel's Nose is in the Tent: Rules, Theories and Slippery Slopes
Slippery slopes have been the topic of a spate of recent literature. In this Article, the authors provide a general theory for understanding and evaluating slippery slope arguments (SSAs) and their