Skeptical Theism and Rowe's New Evidential Argument from Evil

@article{Bergmann2001SkepticalTA,
  title={Skeptical Theism and Rowe's New Evidential Argument from Evil},
  author={Michael Bergmann},
  journal={No{\^u}s},
  year={2001},
  volume={35},
  pages={278-296}
}
Evaluation de la nouvelle version de l'argument evidentialiste du mal developpe par W. Rowe dans le cadre du debat sur le theisme sceptique. Examinant les objections de M. Tooley et B. Russell concernant la representation des biens possibles, l'A. montre que l'argumentation de Rowe n'opere pas une critique significiative du theisme. 
The Problem of Evil, Skeptical Theism and Moral Epistemology
This paper argues that skeptical theism isn’t susceptible to criticisms of the view presented in James Sterba’s new book on the logical problem of evil. Nevertheless, Sterba’s argument does serve to
Sceptical Theism and Evidential Arguments from Evil
Sceptical theists--e.g., William Alston and Michael Bergmann--have claimed that considerations concerning human cognitive limitations are alone sufficient to undermine evidential arguments from evil.
William Rowe's Evidential Argument From Evil and the Skeptical Theists' Responses
William Rowe’s various works on the evidential argument from evil now occupies a central place in the Western discussions on the problem of evil. In one of his formulations, Rowe tries to justify the
Skeptical theism is incompatible with theodicy
Inductive arguments from evil claim that evil presents evidence against the existence of God. Skeptical theists hold that some such arguments from evil evince undue confidence in our familiarity with
The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe's Evidential Argument from Evil
Background to the Problem of Evil.- Rowe's Evidential Arguments from Evil.- What No Eye Has Seen: The Epistemic Foundations of Wykstra's CORNEA Critique.- CORNEA Applied to Rowe's Evidential
Skeptical Theism and Moral Skepticism
Abstract Skeptical theists purport to undermine evidential arguments from evil by appealing to the fact that our knowledge of goods, evils, and their interconnections is significantly limited.
In defence of sceptical theism: a reply to Almeida and Oppy
Some evidential arguments from evil rely on an inference of the following sort: ‘If, after thinking hard, we can't think of any God-justifying reason for permitting some horrific evil then it is
Skeptical Theism, Moral Skepticism, and Divine Commands
Over the last twenty-five years skeptical theism has become one of the leading contemporary responses to the atheological argument from evil. However, more recently, some critics of skeptical theism
Skeptical Theism and Morriston’s Humean Argument from Evil
There’s a growing sense among philosophers of religion that (i) Humean arguments from evil are some of the most formidable arguments against theism, and (ii) skeptical theism fails to undermine those
Skeptical Theism and God’s Commands
According to Michael Almeida and Graham Oppy, adherents of skeptical theism will find their sense of moral obligation undermined in a potentially ‘appalling’ way. Michael Bergmann and Michael Rea
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES
Degenerate Evidence and Rowe’s New Evidential Argument from Evil
Critique de la forme simplifiee de l'argument anti-theiste et evidentiel du mal developpe par W. Rowe. Denoncant l'inconsistance de la conclusion et des structures formelles de cette nouvelle version
God and Inscrutable Evil: In Defense of Theism and Atheism
In this important new book, David O'Connor discusses both logical and empirical forms of the problem of inscrutable evil, perennially the most difficult philosophical problem confronting theism.
Ruminations About Evil
we have reason to conclude that the God of traditional theism (an omnipotent, omniscient, wholly good being) does not exist.1 Confronted with this argument, theists, I suggested, would be wise to
The Evidential Argument from Evil
Preface Introduction: The Evidential Argument from Evil/Daniel Howard-Snyder The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism/William L. Rowe Pain and Pleasure: An Evidential Problem for
THE INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT FROM EVIL AND THE HUMAN COGNITIVE CONDITION
The recent outpouring of literature on the problem of evil has materially advanced the subject in several ways. In particular, a clear distinction has been made between the "logical" argument against
Epistemic Probability and Evil
The amount and variety of evil in our world has often baffled and perplexed believers in God. Evil can occasion deeper problems: faced with the shocking concreteness of a particularly appalling
Reply to Plantinga
Theists believe that God exists and is justified in permitting El and E2. Since evil is intrinsically bad, what justifies God in permitting El and E2 is something else. To simplify matters we will
3. The Problem of Evil, the Problem of Air, and the Problem of Silence
  • P. Inwagen
  • Philosophy
    God, Knowledge, and Mystery
  • 2019
It used to be widely held that evil-which for present purposes we may identify with undeserved pain and suffering-was incompatible with the existence of God: that no possible world contained both God
Defenseless.” In Howard-Snyder 1996b
  • 1996
...
1
2
...