Skeptical Theism and God’s Commands

@article{Maitzen2007SkepticalTA,
  title={Skeptical Theism and God’s Commands},
  author={Stephen Maitzen},
  journal={Sophia},
  year={2007},
  volume={46},
  pages={237-243}
}
According to Michael Almeida and Graham Oppy, adherents of skeptical theism will find their sense of moral obligation undermined in a potentially ‘appalling’ way. Michael Bergmann and Michael Rea disagree, claiming that God’s commands provide skeptical theists with a source of moral obligation that withstands the skepticism in skeptical theism. I argue that Bergmann and Rea are mistaken: skeptical theists cannot consistently rely on what they take to be God’s commands. 

Skeptical theism and moral obligation

Skeptical theism claims that the probability of a perfect God’s existence isn’t at all reduced by our failure to see how such a God could allow the horrific suffering that occurs in our world. Given

Pascal’s Wager and the Nature of God

This paper argues that Pascal’s formulation of his famous wager argument licenses an inference about God's nature that ultimately vitiates the claim that wagering for God is in one’s rational

Epistemic Humility, Arguments from Evil, and Moral Skepticism

The conclusion is frequently more nuanced: ‘‘it is very likely that there is no such reason’’ or ‘‘more likely than not’’ or ‘‘more likely than it otherwise would be’’. Some critics reject the

Skeptical Theism, Moral Skepticism, and Divine Deception

Skeptical theism – a strategy for dealing with so-called ‘evidential arguments from evil’ – is often held to lead to moral skepticism. In this paper I look at some of the responses open to the

Skeptical theism and divine permission: a reply to Anderson

Skeptical theism (ST) may undercut the key inference in the evidential argument from evil, but it does so at a cost. If ST is true, then we lose our ability to assess the all things considered (ATC)

Skeptical theism

  • Justin P. McBrayer
  • Philosophy
    The History of Evil From the Mid-Twentieth Century to Today
  • 2018
Most a posteriori arguments against the existence of God take the following form: (1) If God exists, the world would not be like this (where ‘this’ picks out some feature of the world like the

In Defence of the Epistemological Objection to Divine Command Theory

Divine command theories (DCTs) come in several different forms but at their core all of these theories claim that certain moral statuses (most typically the status of being obligatory) exist in

Education

The School of Education and Human Development has suspended admission into the accredited Secondary Education program for the 2019-2020 academic year. Though admission to the major is currently

Agnosticism, Skeptical Theism, and Moral Obligation

Skeptical theism combines theism with skepticism about our capacity to discern God's morally sufficient reasons for permitting evil. Proponents have claimed that skeptical theism defeats the

Normative Skepticism

References

SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES

In defence of sceptical theism: a reply to Almeida and Oppy

Some evidential arguments from evil rely on an inference of the following sort: ‘If, after thinking hard, we can't think of any God-justifying reason for permitting some horrific evil then it is

Sceptical Theism and Evidential Arguments from Evil

Sceptical theists--e.g., William Alston and Michael Bergmann--have claimed that considerations concerning human cognitive limitations are alone sufficient to undermine evidential arguments from evil.

Skeptical Theism and Rowe's New Evidential Argument from Evil

Evaluation de la nouvelle version de l'argument evidentialiste du mal developpe par W. Rowe dans le cadre du debat sur le theisme sceptique. Examinant les objections de M. Tooley et B. Russell

Rowe ’ s noseeum arguments from evil

  • 1996