Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus membrane elevation and implant placement: a 1- to 6-year follow-up study.

@article{Cricchio2011SinusBF,
  title={Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus membrane elevation and implant placement: a 1- to 6-year follow-up study.},
  author={Giovanni Cricchio and Lars Sennerby and Stefan Lundgren},
  journal={Clinical oral implants research},
  year={2011},
  volume={22 10},
  pages={
          1200-1212
        }
}
OBJECTIVES To investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic results of the maxillary sinus membrane elevation technique where implants were inserted in a void space created by the elevation of the sinus membrane without adding any graft material. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 84 patients were subjected to 96 membrane elevation procedures and simultaneous placement of 239 implants. Changes of intra-sinus and marginal bone height in relation to the implants were measured in intraoral… 
Implant survival following sinus membrane elevation without grafting and immediate implant installation with a one‐stage technique: an up‐to‐40‐month evaluation
TLDR
The findings of the study regarding the immediate placement of implants without the use of bone grafts or other bone substitute materials demonstrate a successful approach for new bone formation around implants in the posterior part of the maxilla, when the preoperative height of the subantral bone is moderate and enough to achieve primary stability.
Follow-Up of the Sinus Membrane Elevation Technique for Maxillary Sinus Implants without the Use of Graft Material.
  • C. Riben, A. Thor
  • Medicine
    Clinical implant dentistry and related research
  • 2016
TLDR
The present study illustrates the long-term reliability of the sinus membrane elevation technique for bone formation around implants in the maxillary sinus floor without the use of bone graft material.
Clinical outcome and factors determining new bone formation in lateral sinus membrane elevation with simultaneous implant placement without grafting material: A cross-sectional, 3-17 year follow-up study.
TLDR
The implant-supported rehabilitation achieved using graft-less LSFE was stable over time, and there was no or little impact on sinus health.
Immediate loading of implants placed simultaneously with sinus membrane elevation in the posterior atrophic maxilla: a two-year follow-up study on 10 patients.
TLDR
It is concluded that maxillary sinus membrane elevation with simultaneous placement and immediate loading of implants without the use of any additional grafting material shows predictable results after 2 years of functional loading.
Long-term outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts: a clinical retrospective study of 4-9 years.
TLDR
Osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts is a predictable treatment modality in the long run, but it should be used with caution when the initial bone height of the edentulous site is lower than 5 mm.
Long-term outcome of dental implants after maxillary augmentation with and without bone grafting
TLDR
The results indicate that bone reformation is a valid technique in cases involving atrophy of the posterior maxilla, and has several advantages over this procedure, including a lower infection risk, as it does not involve a biomaterial, reduced cost, a simpler technique, and better acceptance by the patient.
Resonance frequency analysis assessment of implants placed with a simultaneous or a delayed approach in grafted and nongrafted sinus sites: a 12-month clinical study.
TLDR
The results of the present study suggest that regenerated bone can offer good stability for dental implants, and compare the stability of implants placed in sinus-grafted and -nongrafted sites during 12-month follow-up.
Evaluation of bone regeneration after three different lateral sinus elevation procedures using micro-computed tomography of retrieved experimental implants and surrounding bone: a clinical, prospective, and randomized study.
TLDR
All three lateral sinus elevation procedures were statistically equal when new bone formation was compared and most of the examined implants' apices were not covered with bone at the time of retrieval.
Outcomes of 6.5‐mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison
TLDR
The results suggest that the placement of 6.5-mm short implants with OSFE is an effective alternative for the rehabilitation of a severely atrophic posterior maxilla.
Sinus augmentation and concomitant implant placement in low bone‐density sites. A retrospective study on an undersized drilling protocol and primary stability
TLDR
Underpreparation of the implant-placement sites enabled achievement of successful implant-supported rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla even when both RBH and bone density were low.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 55 REFERENCES
Bone formation at the maxillary sinus floor following simultaneous elevation of the mucosal lining and implant installation without graft material: an evaluation of 20 patients treated with 44 Astra Tech implants.
Non-grafted sinus implants in periodontally compromised patients: a time-to-event analysis.
TLDR
It is demonstrated that sinus implants may be inserted with the same success as conventional implants in periodontally compromised patients and Cox regression analyses showed that the factors influential for implant explantation were implant type, length and patient being a smoker.
Augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor with particulated mandible: a histologic and histomorphometric study.
TLDR
This study presents the results of 10 consecutive patients treated with unilateral bone augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor using particulated mandible harvested from the symphysis with normal healing and bone maturation in all samples.
Histological findings following the use of a space-making device for bone reformation and implant integration in the maxillary sinus of primates.
TLDR
The use of a space-making device, with the design used in the present study, does not result in bone formation at the sinus floor, however, membrane elevation and simultaneous placement of the device and an implant does result in Bone Formation at the implant surface while sites with implants placed 6 months after membrane elevation show only small amounts of bone formation.
A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
TLDR
The results from this clinical and histologic study indicate that similar short-term results can be expected when using autogenous bone, BH, or a mixture of them for maxillary sinus floor augmentation and delayed placement of dental implants.
Bone reformation and implant integration following maxillary sinus membrane elevation: an experimental study in primates.
TLDR
The amount of augmented bone tissue in the maxillary sinus after sinus membrane elevation with or without adjunctive autogenous bone grafts does not differ after 6 months of healing, indicating the osteoinductive potential of the membrane.
Effects of sinus membrane perforations on the success of dental implants placed in the augmented sinus.
TLDR
Perforation of the sinus membrane did not compromise the osseointegration process or the success of dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus within the limits of this study.
Immediate occlusal loading of implants in the partially edentate mandible: a prospective 1-year radiographic and 4-year clinical study.
TLDR
It is concluded that immediate loading of implants with firm primary stability in partially edentulous areas of the mandible appears to be a viable procedure with predictable outcome.
Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts.
TLDR
This study retrospectively evaluated the results of 36 sinus-lift graft augmentations performed to place 66 implant cylinders in the posterior maxilla where vertical bone height was less than ideal, allowing comparison of different graft materials and healing times.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...