Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.

@article{Pan2013SingleincisionVT,
  title={Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.},
  author={Ming-xin Pan and Ze-sheng Jiang and Yuan Guo Cheng and Xiaoping Xu and Zhi Zhang and Jia-sheng Qin and Guo-lin He and Ting-cheng Xu and Chen-jie Zhou and Hai-yan Liu and Yi Gao},
  journal={World journal of gastroenterology},
  year={2013},
  volume={19 3},
  pages={394-8}
}
AIM To compare the clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TPLC). METHODS Between 2009 and 2011, one hundred and two patients with symptomatic benign gallbladder diseases were randomized to SILC (n = 49) or TPLC (n = 53). The primary end point was post operative pain score (at 6 h and 7 d). Secondary end points were blood loss, operation duration, overall complications, postoperative analgesic requirements, length… CONTINUE READING

Connections & Topics

Mentioned Connections BETA
Single - incision vs three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy : prospective randomized study .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
Surgical techniques were standardized and all operations were performed by one experienced surgeon , who had performed more than 500 laparoscopic cholecystectomies .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
There were no differences in terms of estimated blood loss ( mean ± SD , 14 ± 6.0 mL vs 15 ± 4.0 mL ) , operation duration ( mean ± SD , 41.8 ± 17.0 min vs 38.5 ± 22.0 min ) , port - site complications ( contusion at incision : 5 cases vs 4 cases and hematoma at incision : 2 cases vs 1 case ) , total cost ( mean ± SD , 12 075 ± 1047 RMB vs 11 982 ± 1153 RMB ) and hospital stay ( mean ± SD , 1.0 ± 0.5 d vs 1.0 ± 0.2 d ) , respectively .
Secondary end points were blood loss , operation duration , overall complications , postoperative analgesic requirements , length of hospital stay , cosmetic result and total cost .
Secondary end points were blood loss , operation duration , overall complications , postoperative analgesic requirements , length of hospital stay , cosmetic result and total cost .
Surgical techniques were standardized and all operations were performed by one experienced surgeon , who had performed more than 500 laparoscopic cholecystectomies .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
Single - incision vs three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy : prospective randomized study .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
To compare the clinical outcome of single - incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( SILC ) with three - port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( TPLC ) . METHODS .
All Topics