Simplicity and validity in infant research

@inproceedings{Kominsky2020SimplicityAV,
  title={Simplicity and validity in infant research},
  author={Jonathan F. Kominsky and Kelsey Lucca and Ashley J. Thomas and Michael C. Frank and Kiley Hamlin},
  year={2020}
}
Infancy researchers have often drawn rich conclusions about early capacities to understand abstract concepts like "causality" or "prosociality" from infants' responses to highly simplified and artificial stimuli, leading to questions about the validity of studies utilizing these methods. Indeed, do these stimuli effectively illustrate abstract concepts to infant participants? And if they do, why not assess infants’ cognitive capacities using ecologically valid stimuli of the sort that infants… 
6 Citations
Does helping now excuse cheating later? An investigation into moral balancing in children
TLDR
This hypothesis was not supported, suggesting either that 4–5-year-old children do not engage in moral balancing or that the methodology used was not appropriate to capture this effect.
Early concepts of intimacy: Young humans use saliva sharing to infer close relationships
TLDR
It is found that children, toddlers, and infants infer that dyads who share saliva have a distinct relationship, indicating that they can distinguish closeness very early in life.
Moderated Online Data-Collection for Developmental Research: Methods and Replications
TLDR
This article reviews existing approaches for designing and executing moderated online studies with young children and presents concrete examples of studies that implemented choice and verbal measures and looking time across both in-person and online moderated data collection methods.