• Corpus ID: 251253383

Simple models predict behavior at least as well as behavioral scientists

  title={Simple models predict behavior at least as well as behavioral scientists},
  author={Dillon Bowen},
How accurately can behavioral scientists predict behavior? To answer this question, we analyzed data from five studies in which 640 professional behavioral scientists predicted the results of one or more behavioral science experiments. We compared the behavioral scientists’ predictions to random chance, linear models, and simple heuristics like “behavioral interventions have no effect” and “all published psychology research is false.” We find that behavioral scientists are consistently no better… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The Impact of Joint Versus Separate Prediction Mode on Forecasting Accuracy

Forecasters predicting how people change their behavior in response to a treatment or intervention often consider a set of alternatives. In contrast, those who are treated are typically exposed to



Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science.

In a megastudy targeting physical exercise among 61,293 members of an American fitness chain, 30 scientists from 15 different US universities worked in small independent teams to design a total of 54 different four-week digital programmes encouraging exercise, it is shown that 45% of these interventions significantly increased weekly gym visits.

What Motivates Effort? Evidence and Expert Forecasts

How much do different monetary and non-monetary motivators induce costly effort? Does the effectiveness line up with the expectations of researchers? We present the results of a large-scale

Predicting Experimental Results: Who Knows What?

Analysis of how academic experts and nonexperts forecast the results of 15 piece-rate and behavioral treatments in a real-effort task allows us to identify “superforecasters” among the nonexperTS.

Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research

It is argued that prediction markets could be used to obtain speedy information about reproducibility at low cost and could potentially even beused to determine which studies to replicate to optimally allocate limited resources into replications.

Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction

A New York Times Bestseller An Economist Best Book of 2015 "The most important book on decision making since Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow." Jason Zweig, The Wall Street Journal Everyone

No evidence for nudging after adjusting for publication bias

Thaler and Sunstein’s “nudge” (1) has spawned a revolution in behavioral science research. Despite its popularity, the “nudge approach” has been criticized for having a “limited evidence base” (e.g.,

Multiple Inference: A Python package for comparing multiple parameters

Scientists often want to compare many parameters. For example, scientists often run randomized control trials to study the effects of many treatments, use observational data to compare many

Daniel Kahneman, Olivier Sibony and Cass R. Sunstein: Noise: a flaw in human judgment

A 680,000-person megastudy of nudges to encourage vaccination in pharmacies

A megastudy with 689,693 Walmart pharmacy customers demonstrates that text-based reminders can encourage pharmacy vaccination and establishes what kinds of messages work best.

Nonparametric Empirical Bayes Estimation and Testing for Sparse and Heteroscedastic Signals

A novel Spike-and-Nonparametric mixture prior (SNP) is proposed – a spike to promote the sparsity and a nonparametric structure to capture signals to solve the estimation and testing problem at once with several merits.