Similarity measures for automated comparison of in silico and in vitro experimental results

@article{Ropella2003SimilarityMF,
  title={Similarity measures for automated comparison of in silico and in vitro experimental results},
  author={Glen E. P. Ropella and D. Nag and C. Hunt},
  journal={Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439)},
  year={2003},
  volume={3},
  pages={2933-2936 Vol.3}
}
  • Glen E. P. Ropella, D. Nag, C. Hunt
  • Published 2003
  • Computer Science
  • Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439)
  • The overwhelming complexity of biological systems prevents exhaustive description of the processes and mechanisms that cause system functionality. There are large numbers of processes to be considered with options for manifold hypotheses describing each. The long-term goal of this project, for a particular biological system, is to put the computer to work weeding out the weaker hypotheses and, even, weeding out posited processes that do not pertain directly to specific functionality. An… CONTINUE READING
    9 Citations

    Topics from this paper

    Similarity Measures and Validation in Automated Modeling
    • 1
    • PDF
    Prediction of in Vitro Hepatic Biliary Excretion using Stochastic Agent-Based Modeling and Fuzzy Clustering
    • 17
    • PDF
    Tracing Multiscale Mechanisms of Drug Disposition in Normal and Diseased Livers
    • 29
    • PDF
    Affects of Surface Detection on Shape and Growth of Model Tumor Spheroids
    • PDF
    Application and processing of Time Domain Reflectometry: a model-based approach
    • 1

    References

    SHOWING 1-3 OF 3 REFERENCES
    Modeling of Hepatic Elimination and Organ Distribution Kinetics with the Extended Convection-Dispersion Model
    • 27
    Similarity Measures
    • S. Santini, R. Jain
    • Mathematics, Computer Science
    • IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.
    • 1999
    • 803
    • PDF