Signifying nothing: reply to Hoover and Siegler

@article{McCloskey2008SignifyingNR,
  title={Signifying nothing: reply to Hoover and Siegler},
  author={D. McCloskey and S. Ziliak},
  journal={Journal of Economic Methodology},
  year={2008},
  volume={15},
  pages={39 - 55}
}
  • D. McCloskey, S. Ziliak
  • Published 2008
  • Philosophy
  • Journal of Economic Methodology
  • After William Gosset (1876–1937), the ‘Student’ of Student's t, the best statisticians have distinguished economic (or agronomic or psychological or medical) significance from merely statistical ‘significance’ at conventional levels. A singular exception among the best was Ronald A. Fisher, who argued in the 1920s that statistical significance at the 0.05 level is a necessary and sufficient condition for establishing a scientific result. After Fisher many economists and some others – but rarely… CONTINUE READING
    36 Citations

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 121 REFERENCES
    How to be Human*: *Though an Economist
    • 49
    The Impact of R. A. Fisher on Statistics
    • 18
    The earth is round (p < .05)
    • 3,461
    • PDF
    STATISTICAL METHODS AND SCIENTIFIC INDUCTION
    • 396