Shouldn't Dead Be Dead?: The Search for a Uniform Definition of Death

@article{Lewis2017ShouldntDB,
  title={Shouldn't Dead Be Dead?: The Search for a Uniform Definition of Death},
  author={Ariane Lewis and Katherine L. Cahn-Fuller and Arthur L. Caplan},
  journal={The Journal of Law, Medicine \& Ethics},
  year={2017},
  volume={45},
  pages={112 - 128}
}
In 1968, the definition of death in the United States was expanded to include not just death by cardiopulmonary criteria, but also death by neurologic criteria. We explore the way the definition has been modified by the medical and legal communities over the past 50 years and address the medical, legal and ethical controversies associated with the definition at present, with a particular highlight on the Supreme Court of Nevada Case of Aden Hailu. 

Tables from this paper

Contentious Ethical and Legal Aspects of Determination of Brain Death
  • A. Lewis
  • Medicine
    Seminars in neurology
  • 2018
TLDR
Historic and contemporary ethical and legal disputes about determination of death by neurologic criteria including the need for consent from patients' surrogates prior to determination of Death, the role of religion in determination ofdeath, and management of objections to determined death are explored.
Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United States: The Case for Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act
TLDR
The legal history and current laws regarding neurologic criteria to declare death are reviewed and proposed revisions to the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) are offered and the rationale for these recommendations are offered.
Controversies in Brain Death Declaration: Legal and Ethical Implications in the ICU
TLDR
Uniform training in proper methodology in performing the brain death examination and appropriate use of ancillary testing is crucial, and there is a need for legal consistency in the acceptance of the medical standard.
The Uniform Determination of Death Act is Being Revised
The Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA), the recommended legal statute for determination of death in the United States, was initially formulated in 1981. Forty years later, because of the
Contemporary Legal Updates to the Definition of Brain Death in Nevada
TLDR
Modifications to the Uniform Determination of Death Act stipulate that determination of death is a clinical decision and does not require consent from a patient’s family and cost of continuing organ support after determination of DNC may become the responsibility of a patient's family.
Should the Revised Uniform Determination of Death Act Address Objections to the Use of Neurologic Criteria to Declare Death?
TLDR
The historical background and survey results that demonstrate the need to address objections to the use of neurologic criteria to declare death are provided and ethical principles that support and oppose accommodation of objections are summarized.
It's Time to Revise the Uniform Determination of Death Act
Since 1981, the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) has provided the legal basis for defining brain death in the United States, but ambiguities in its language have led to different interpret...
Does the Uniform Determination of Death Act Need to Be Revised?
TLDR
This article critically examines the recent revision of the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) advanced by Lewis and colleagues and offers two approaches to revising the UDDA, both of which are founded on sound moral principles.
Revise the Uniform Determination of Death Act to Align the Law With Practice Through Neurorespiratory Criteria
TLDR
It is argued for the revision of the UDDA to more accurately specify legal criteria that align with the medical standards: brain injury leading to permanent loss of the capacity for consciousness, the ability to breathe spontaneously, and brainstem reflexes.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 121 REFERENCES
After the "definition of irreversible coma".
  • H. Beecher
  • Political Science
    The New England journal of medicine
  • 1969
TLDR
Over a year ago, a committee was appointed by the Harvard Medical School with instructions to define death, but it shied away from this assignment because the aspects of death are so many.
THE HISTORY OF BRAIN DEATH AND HOW THE JAHI MCMATH CASE WILL IMPACT FUTURE BRAIN DEAD PATIENTS.
TLDR
The recent highly publicized case of Jahi McMath, a 13-year-old who was declared brain dead and transferred to a long-term care facility, illustrates these issues and raises new challenges and questions about the management of brain dead patients.
Brain death and the courts
TLDR
Legal cases between 1980 and 2010 involving neurologic criteria for death since adoption of the Uniform Determination of Death Act are reviewed, and nothing in the court cases suggests a need to alter the current medical standard of brain death determination.
International guideline development for the determination of death
Introduction and MethodsThis report summarizes the results of the first phase in the development of international guidelines for death determination, focusing on the biology of death and the dying
Why brain death is considered death and why there should be no confusion
TLDR
It is asserted that the prolonged support of a brain dead patient is a misuse of medical science and an ethical concern that deserves greater attention from the medical community and society as a whole.
Variability of Brain Death Policies in the United States.
TLDR
Hospital policies in the United States for the determination of brain death are still widely variable and not fully congruent with contemporary practice parameters, and hospitals should be encouraged to implement the 2010 AAN guidelines.
‘Brain death’: should it be reconsidered?
TLDR
It is presented four arguments to support the view that patients who meet the current operational criteria of ‘brain death’ do not necessarily have the irreversible loss of all brain (or brainstem) functions.
The neurologist and Harvard criteria for brain death
TLDR
Review of the original files and interviews with three surviving members revealed a major role and original contributions of the neurologists Schwab and Adams in defining criteria, and a swift and decisive working committee that formulated a document aimed at simplicity and accuracy, and without special interest.
A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy
TLDR
A review of the empirical literature suggests that, despite scholarly claims of widespread public support for organ donation from brain dead patients, the existing data on public attitudes regarding brain death and organ transplantation reflect substantial public confusion.
...
...