Short‐term intermittent energy restriction interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

@article{Harris2018ShorttermIE,
  title={Short‐term intermittent energy restriction interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta‐analysis},
  author={Leanne Harris and Arlene M McGarty and Lisa Hutchison and Louisa Jane Ells and Catherine Ruth Hankey},
  journal={Obesity Reviews},
  year={2018},
  volume={19},
  pages={1 - 13}
}
This systematic review synthesized the available evidence on the effect of short‐term periods of intermittent energy restriction (weekly intermittent energy restriction; ≥7‐d energy restriction) in comparison with usual care (daily continuous energy restriction), in the treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2016. Only randomized controlled trials of interventions (≥12 weeks) in adults with overweight and obesity were… 
Impact of intermittent energy restriction on anthropometric outcomes and intermediate disease markers in patients with overweight and obesity: systematic review and meta-analyses
TLDR
IER improves anthropometric outcomes and intermediate disease markers when compared to a usual diet and the effects of IER on weight loss are similar to weight loss achieved by CER.
Comparison of the Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction and Continuous Energy Restriction among Adults with Overweight or Obesity: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
TLDR
An overview of systematic reviews aimed to evaluate and synthesize the existing evidence regarding the comparison of the two interventions and found intermittent energy restriction did not seem to be more effective in weight loss compared with continuous energy restriction.
Effects of intermittent versus continuous dieting on weight and body composition in obese and overweight people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
TLDR
It is suggested that lean mass is better preserved in continuous dieting compared to regular intermittent dieting, and there were no differences in effects for either intermittent vs continuous interventions across all other outcomes.
Efficacy of Intermittent or Continuous Very Low-Energy Diets in Overweight and Obese Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
TLDR
The meta-analyses showed that compared with a low-energy diet (LED) and mild energy restriction (MER), VLED is superior in the reduction of body weight and TG level and should be encouraged in overweight and obese individuals with T2DM who urgently need weight loss and are unsuitable or unwilling to undergo surgery.
Nonsurgical weight loss interventions: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses
TLDR
The most effective nonsurgical weight loss interventions were diets, either low‐carbohydrate or low‐fat diets, followed for 6 months; combination therapy including meal replacements plus enhanced support; and pharmacotherapy followed for 12 months, although significant weight losses were reported for other types of interventions such as physical activity and technology.
Strategies to reduce attrition in weight loss interventions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
  • S. PirottaA. Joham L. Brennan
  • Medicine, Psychology
    Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity
  • 2019
TLDR
Implementation of financial incentives, multicomponent interventions, and self‐monitoring technology help reduce attrition among adult weight loss programmes.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 57 REFERENCES
Weight-Loss Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intermittent Energy Restriction Trials Lasting a Minimum of 6 Months
TLDR
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarise the effects of intermittent energy restriction on weight and biological markers in long term intervention studies of >6 months duration, with results indicating neither intermittent or continuous energy restriction being superior with respect to weight loss.
Intermittent fasting interventions for the treatment of overweight and obesity in adults aged 18 years and over: a systematic review and meta-analysis
TLDR
Intermittent energy restriction was shown to be more effective than no treatment, however, this should be interpreted cautiously due to the small number of studies and future research is warranted to confirm the findings of this review.
Short- and long-term effects of continuous versus intermittent restrictive diet approaches on body composition and the metabolic profile in overweight and obese postmenopausal women: a pilot study
TLDR
The ID resulted in similar short- and long-term changes in body composition and metabolic profile compared with a CD and at the 1-year follow-up, both interventions were associated with successful and similar weight loss maintenance and improvements in fasting plasma glucose levels.
The effects of intermittent or continuous energy restriction on weight loss and metabolic disease risk markers: a randomized trial in young overweight women
TLDR
IER is as effective as CER with regard to weight loss, insulin sensitivity and other health biomarkers, and may be offered as an alternative equivalent to CER for weight loss and reducing disease risk.
Intermittent versus daily calorie restriction: which diet regimen is more effective for weight loss?
  • K. Varady
  • Medicine
    Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity
  • 2011
TLDR
These findings suggest that these diets are equally as effective in decreasing body weight and fat mass, although intermittent CR may be more effective for the retention of lean mass.
Intermittent vs continuous VLCD therapy in obesity treatment
  • S. Rössner
  • Medicine
    International Journal of Obesity
  • 1998
TLDR
In two studies the effects of 420 or 530 kcal of Nutrilett ® given daily to 40 and 61 patients, either continuously for six weeks or for three periods of two weeks with four weeks maintenance interval, resulted in long term weight losses and compliance similar to those obtained by more continuous VLCD therapy.
Health effects of intermittent fasting: hormesis or harm? A systematic review.
TLDR
Clinical research studies of fasting with robust designs and high levels of clinical evidence are sparse in the literature, and substantial further research in humans is needed before the use of fasting as a health intervention can be recommended.
The effects of intermittent energy restriction on indices of cardiometabolic health
TLDR
Overall, whilst much remains to be learned about IER, including its mechanisms of action and long-term efficacy, the positive findings to date serve to highlight promising avenues for future research.
What is the most effective way to maintain weight loss in adults?
TLDR
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 randomised controlled trials found that diet alone, diet and exercise, and meal replacements led to weight loss at 12%, which is in line with US Institute of Medicine guidance.
...
...