Shifty Operators in Changing Contexts

@article{Anand2004ShiftyOI,
  title={Shifty Operators in Changing Contexts},
  author={P. Anand and A. Nevins},
  journal={Semantics and Linguistic Theory},
  year={2004},
  volume={14},
  pages={20-37}
}
It 's fair to say that the study of indexicality has been primarily occupied with an­ swering one question: Why are certain elements I, you, yesterday opaque to modal quantification? Indeed, Kaplan ( 1977), the most celebrated theory of index­ icality, is designed precisely to answer this question: indexicals are rigidly speci­ fied once the character of a sentence is applied to the utterance context, before the content is derived. And yet, recent work in a variety of languages (e.g . , Aghem… Expand
A plea for syntax and a return to first principles: monstrous agreement in Tamil
The paper focuses on an interesting form of (person) indexical shift in the Dravidian language Tamil which surfaces as 1SG agreement marking in a clause embedded under a speech predicate. I show thatExpand
Monsters in Kaplan’s logic of demonstratives
Kaplan (1989a) insists that natural languages do not contain displacing devices that operate on character—such displacing devices are called monsters. This thesis has recently faced various empiricalExpand
The semantics of person and de se effects in free indirect discourse
TLDR
This contribution claims that Schlenker’s split between CU and CT can be derived in a principled way from the inner nature of FID as a linguistic process of ‘phenomenal identification’, whereby a Higher Experiencer attempts at reproducing the phenomenal experience proper to a Lower Experiencers. Expand
Motion Deixis, Indexicality, and Presupposition
This paper argues that deictic verbs GO and COME (English go and come and their counterparts in other languages) are kinds of indexicals in the Kaplanian sense. In Sections 2-3, building on OshimaExpand
Three routes to person indexicality
Uncontroversially, the meaning of first and second person pronouns and “imposters”, i.e. expressions like yours truly (Collins and Postal in Imposters: a study of pronominal agreement. MIT Press,Expand
Shifty attitudes: Indexical-shift vs. perspectival anaphora
In cases of indexical-shift, so-called indexical pronouns like ‘I’, ‘you’, ‘here’ and ‘now’ refer to the Speaker, Addressee, Location, and Time of some other context than the utterance-context. InExpand
Reporting, Dialogue, and the Role of Grammar
TLDR
This chapter argues that grammatical models can be extended to account for metarepresentational phenomena, but not under standard assumptions as to what kind of mechanism “syntax” is and what the differentiation is between grammatical and pragmatic processes. Expand
Operators vs. quantifiers: the view from linguistics
ABSTRACT In several publications, François Recanati argues that time, world, location, and similar constituents are not arguments of the verb, although they do affect truth conditions. However, heExpand
Person and binding ( A partial survey )
We provide a partial survey of three approaches to two problems in the semantics of person, which we call the ‘Bindability Problem’ and the ‘Shiftability Problem’. On the standard (Kaplanian) view ofExpand
Evidentiality and the Distribution ofOC PRO
(1a) shows that nikurasi-i must take a first person subject when it occurs in a declarative root clause. (1b-c) are examples obtained by embedding kanasi-i in a sentential complement. Whereas theExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES
A Plea For Monsters
We argue that attitude operators can manipulate the context of evaluation of some indexicals, and should thus be essentially treated as Kaplanian monsters. The analysis is developed in an extensionalExpand
Semantik: Ein Internationales Handbuch Der Zeitgenössischen Forschung
TLDR
The aim of this handbook is to represent the body of theoretical knowledge which has evolved in the international research of the last two decades, and is indispensable for all research in linguistics and neighboring disciplines. Expand
Structured Meanings: The Semantics of Propositional Attitudes.
M. J. Cresswell is a logician and philosopher of language who has been a major continuing influence on the growth and development of formal semantics over the past 15 years or more. This book is theExpand
Semantics in generative grammar
TLDR
This chapter discusses truth-conditional Semantics and the Fregean Program, and first steps towards an Intensional Semantics. Expand
Context and binding in Japanese
TLDR
This work proposes a unified theory of zibun-binding based on the representation of zero pronouns and its role in the development of post-modernism. Expand
Pronoun Movement in Dream Reports
When you dream, you can dream that you are someone else. John does this. John is very jealous of his colleague Fred, who seems to have all the good things in life: money, a beautiful house, aExpand
Oratio obliqua, oratio recta
Ce troisieme entretien avec le philosophe Francois RECANATI revient sur son dernier ouvrage publie au moment de l’entretien, intitule « Oratio obliqua, oratio recta ». A la croisee de la pragmatiqueExpand
A Plea for Monsters . Ling. and Phil
  • A Plea for Monsters . Ling. and Phil
  • 2003
Feature deletion under semantic binding: Tense, person, and mood under verbal quantifiers
  • Feature deletion under semantic binding: Tense, person, and mood under verbal quantifiers
  • 2002
A grammar of Mupun
...
1
2
3
4
...