Shifting Stereotypes of Welfare Recipients Can Reverse Racial Biases in Support for Wealth Redistribution

@article{Cooley2019ShiftingSO,
  title={Shifting Stereotypes of Welfare Recipients Can Reverse Racial Biases in Support for Wealth Redistribution},
  author={Erin Cooley and Jazmin L. Brown-Iannuzzi and Caroline Boudreau},
  journal={Social Psychological and Personality Science},
  year={2019},
  volume={10},
  pages={1065 - 1074}
}
When people imagine welfare recipients, research indicates that they often imagine lazy, Black Americans who are perpetually dependent on government assistance. In the present work, we investigate the last assumption—perpetual dependence. We hypothesize that providing information about recipients’ ability to obtain financial independence may reduce racial biases in support for welfare policies. In Study 1, when given no information about recipients’ ability to obtain independence, White… 

Figures from this paper

Investigating the Interplay Between Race, Work Ethic Stereotypes, and Attitudes Toward Welfare Recipients and Policies

The current research investigates the role of racialized work ethic stereotypes on attitudes toward welfare. We hypothesized that work ethic stereotypes shape both people’s attitudes toward welfare

Inequality in socially permissible consumption

TLDR
It is demonstrated that lower-income individuals are held to more restrictive standards of permissible consumption, judged negatively for purchasing the same items as their higher-income peers.

Complex intersections of race and class: Among social liberals, learning about White privilege reduces sympathy, increases blame, and decreases external attributions for White people struggling with poverty.

TLDR
It is concluded that, among social liberals, White privilege lessons may increase beliefs that poor White people have failed to take advantage of their racial privilege-leading to negative social evaluations.

Impact of Race/Ethnicity, Veteran Status, and Place of Birth on Attitudes Towards Welfare Recipients: An Experimental Approach

TLDR
The general pattern of results showed that welfare recipients were evaluated more positively when they were veterans, born in the United States, or were White or Asian, and the public evaluated the welfare recipient more negatively or held more aversive emotions towards them when they was Hispanic, Black, notBorn in the US, or not a veteran.

Construction and Validation of the Legitimizing Income Inequality Scale

Although income inequality has become a focus of political and social discourse, counseling psychology research examining correlates and consequences of legitimizing income inequality remains sparse.

People in the United States judge the success of individuals from higher- versus lower-income families as less deserving

Extant research demonstrates that individuals from higher-income families are more likely to become successful than individuals from lower-income families. This research aims at investigating how

Investigating the Health Consequences for White Americans Who Believe White Americans Are Wealthy

Poor White Americans report feeling “worse off” than poor Black Americans despite the persistent negative effects of racism on Black Americans. Additionally, some health issues are rising among White

The social psychology of economic inequality, redistribution, and subjective well-being

ABSTRACT As economic inequality continues to rise, there is increased concern about both the consequences of inequality and what can be done to reverse this trend. In the present paper, we review the

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 53 REFERENCES

The Relationship Between Mental Representations of Welfare Recipients and Attitudes Toward Welfare

TLDR
Mental images of welfare recipients may bias attitudes toward welfare policies, and the average welfare-recipient image was perceived as more African American and more representative of stereotypes associated with welfare recipients and African Americans.

Race, prejudice and attitudes toward redistribution: A comparative experimental approach

Past work suggests that support for welfare in the United States is heavily influenced by citizens' racial attitudes. Indeed, the idea that many Americans think of welfare recipients as poor Blacks

Racial Attitudes and Opposition to Welfare

This article examines the role of racial attitudes in shaping white Americans' opposition to welfare. Past research on welfare views has focused on economic self-interest, individualism, and

“Race Coding” and White Opposition to Welfare

Crime and welfare are now widely viewed as “coded” issues that activate white Americans' negative views of blacks without explicitly raising the “race card.” But does the desire of whites to combat

Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State.

Despite the substantial economic and political strides that African-Americans have made in th 20th century, welfare remains an issue that sharply divides Americans by race. This text explores the

Racial Perceptions and Evaluative Responses to Welfare: Does Education Attenuate Race‐of‐Target Effects?

A growing body of research indicates that welfare attitudes may be strongly shaped by negative perceptions of Blacks. This raises questions about what might inhibit the racialization of welfare

Appeasement

This article explores the possibility that dominant-group members will attempt to appease subordinate groups to protect the hierarchy. In four studies, we find that (a) prohierarchy Whites perceive

More Diverse Yet Less Tolerant? How the Increasingly Diverse Racial Landscape Affects White Americans’ Racial Attitudes

TLDR
The results suggest that rather than ushering in a more tolerant future, the increasing diversity of the nation may instead yield intergroup hostility.

The Determinants of Public Attitudes Toward the Welfare State

7This paper develops and tests a causal model of the determinants of public attitudes toward welfare state programs. It proposes that support of welfare state programs is a function of self-interest

Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind

In 2001 and 2003, the Bush administration engineered two enormous tax cuts primarily benefiting very wealthy taxpayers. Most Americans supported these tax cuts. I argue that they did so not because
...