Shared Outrage and Erratic Awards : The Psychology of Punitive Damages

  title={Shared Outrage and Erratic Awards : The Psychology of Punitive Damages},
  author={Daniel Kahneman},
An experimental study of punitive damage awards in personal injury cases was conducted, using jury-eligible respondents. There was substantial consensus on judgments of the outrageousness of a defendant’s actions and of the appropriate severity of punishment. Judgments of dollar awards made by individuals and synthetic juries were much more erratic. These results are familiar characteristics of judgments made on unbounded magnitude scales. The degree of harm suffered by the plaintiff and the… CONTINUE READING


Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 25 references

Preferences, Attitudes and Dollars,

  • Kahneman, Daniel, Ilana Ritov
  • Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,
  • 1998

“ Preferences , Attitudes and Dollars , ” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , in press

  • Ilana Ritov.
  • 1998

Effects of Group Size and Procedural Influence on Consensual Judgments of Quantity: The Example of Damage Awards and Mock Juries,

  • Davis, H James, Wing Tung Au, Lorne Hulbert, Xiao-ping Chen, Paul Zarnoth
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • 1997
1 Excerpt

Effects of Plaintiff Identity and Plaintiff’s Damage Request on Juror Assessments of Punitive Damages,

  • Hastie, Reid, David Schkade, John Payne
  • Working paper
  • 1997

Punitive Damages: An Economic Analysis,

  • Polinsky, A. Mitchell, Steve Shavell
  • Harvard Law Review
  • 1997

The Predictability of Punitive Damages,

  • Eisenberg, Theodore, John Goerdt, Brian Ostrom, David Rottman, Martin Wells
  • Journal of Legal Studies
  • 1997
1 Excerpt

Group Decision Making and Quantitative Judgments: A Consensus Model.

  • Davis, H James
  • 1996

The More You Ask for the More You Get: Anchoring in Personal Injury Verdicts,

  • Chapman, Gretchen, Brian Bornstein
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • 1996

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…