Shame, guilt, and secrets on the mind.

@article{Slepian2019ShameGA,
  title={Shame, guilt, and secrets on the mind.},
  author={Michael L. Slepian and James N. Kirby and Elise Katherine Kalokerinos},
  journal={Emotion},
  year={2019}
}
Recent work suggests that what is harmful about secrecy is not active concealment within social interactions but rather mind wandering to a secret outside of concealment contexts. However, it is not yet clear what predicts mind wandering to and concealing secrets. We proposed that emotional appraisals of shame and guilt for secrecy would predict how secrecy is experienced. Four studies with 1,000 participants keeping more than 6,000 secrets demonstrated that shame was linked with increased mind… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Emotion Appraisals and Coping with Secrets.
Secrecy is both common and consequential. Recent work suggests that personal experiences with secrets (i.e., mind-wandering to them outside of concealment contexts), rather than concealment (within
The Solitude of Secrecy: Thinking About Secrets Evokes Goal Conflict and Feelings of Fatigue
Past research has conceptualized secrecy as speech inhibition during social interaction. In contrast, the current research broadens the understanding of secrecy by conceptualizing it as the
Thinking Through Secrets: Rethinking the Role of Thought Suppression in Secrecy
TLDR
It is suggested that people do not universally seek to suppress their secrets; they also seek to engage with them, although not always effectively.
Motivated secrecy: Politics, relationships, and regrets
Recent work has explored the dynamics of secrecy and its outcomes, but has yet to examine the motivations people have for engaging in secrecy and how such motivations shape the experience of secrecy
Morality, punishment, and revealing other people's secrets.
Nine studies represent the first investigation into when and why people reveal other people's secrets. Although people keep their own immoral secrets to avoid being punished, we propose that people
Factors promoting greater preoccupation with a secret.
TLDR
It is concluded that the characteristics of the secret, as well as the secret-keeper, can contribute to how preoccupying a secret is to an individual.
Is Chronic Shame a Life Sentence?
Shame is a painful, universal emotional response to a failure, shortcoming, or other wrongdoing of what society demands or what a person demands of him or herself. Scientists have learned that very
The effect of suppressing guilt and shame on the immoral decision-making process
The role of emotions in all stages of the moral decision-making process has previously been addressed. Little attention, however, has been paid to how the decision-making process is altered when
Secretive and close? How sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance
TLDR
This project experimentally investigates whether secret-sharing might in turn increase perceptions of closeness, and investigates lay theories about sharing secrets, and how a sharer might choose secrets of negative or positive valence to decrease perceived distance on the receiver's side.
The Role of Guilt and Empathy on Prosocial Behavior
Research on the effects of guilt on interpersonal relationships has shown that guilt frequently motivates prosocial behavior in dyadic social situations. When multiple persons are involved, however,
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES
The Experience of Secrecy
TLDR
It is demonstrated that people catch themselves spontaneously thinking about their secrets far more frequently than they encounter social situations that require active concealment of those secrets, and the frequency of mind-wandering to secrets predicts lower well-being.
The Solitude of Secrecy: Thinking About Secrets Evokes Goal Conflict and Feelings of Fatigue
Past research has conceptualized secrecy as speech inhibition during social interaction. In contrast, the current research broadens the understanding of secrecy by conceptualizing it as the
The benefits and burdens of keeping others' secrets
Exploring the secrecy burden: secrets, preoccupation, and perceptual judgments.
TLDR
The current work finds that a manipulation of secret "size" fails to reliably predict judged hill slant, whereas measurement and manipulation of preoccupation with a secret does reliably predict Judging Hill slant.
Confiding Secrets and Well-Being
How does confiding secrets relate to well-being? The current work presents the first empirical examination of mechanisms by which confiding diverse real-world secrets to known others predicts
To Whom Do We Confide Our Secrets?
TLDR
Five studies find compassion and assertiveness predict having secrets confiding in oneself (as determined by both self- and peer reports), whereas enthusiasm and politeness were associated with having fewer secrets confided.
The cognitive consequences of secrecy.
Four research paradigms explored links from secrecy to the suppression and intrusive recurrence of secret thoughts. In Study I, keeping a word secret enhanced cognitive accessibility of the word on a
Truth or Punishment: Secrecy and Punishing the Self
TLDR
It is demonstrated that thinking about secret (vs. confessed) misdeeds leads to increased self-punishment (increased denial of pleasure and seeking of pain), and those who seek an escape from justice by keeping secrets may in fact end up serving that same justice on themselves (through self- Punishment).
The cost of keeping it hidden: decomposing concealment reveals what makes it depleting.
TLDR
The studies are the first to assess which part of an act of self-regulation--monitoring for specific behavior to override or the actual altering of that behavior--is responsible for observed depletion, and suggest that social environments that explicitly or implicitly encourage identity concealment may prevent people from performing optimally.
The hidden effects of recalling secrets: Assimilation, contrast, and the burdens of secrecy.
TLDR
The concept of manipulation correspondence is introduced to understand patterns of results and speak to a fundamental principle of recall manipulations; when recalling a particular experience, correspondence with the manipulation will determine its effects, and the process of recalling an experience (and comparing it to a prompt) might change how one perceives that experience.
...
...