Self-Presentation and Verbal Deception: Do Self-Presenters Lie More?

@article{Feldman2002SelfPresentationAV,
  title={Self-Presentation and Verbal Deception: Do Self-Presenters Lie More?},
  author={Robert Simion Feldman and James A. Forrest and Benjamin R. Happ},
  journal={Basic and Applied Social Psychology},
  year={2002},
  volume={24},
  pages={163 - 170}
}
This study examined the effects of self-presentation goals on the amount and type of verbal deception used by participants in same-gender and mixed-gender dyads. Participants were asked to engage in a conversation that was secretly videotaped. Self-presentational goal was manipulated, where one member of the dyad (the self-presenter) was told to either appear (a) likable, (b) competent, or (c) was told to simply get to know his or her partner (control condition). After the conversation, self… 

Truth, Lies, and Self-Presentation: How Gender and Anticipated Future Interaction Relate to Deceptive Behavior1

The present study hypothesized that gender and expectation of future interaction affects the frequency and nature of lying. Male and female participants (208 undergraduates) were randomly assigned to

Self-deception and Other-deception in Personality Assessment: Detection and Implications

The present study utilized multiple methods of detecting self-deception and other-deception and explored potential implications for organizations hiring individuals exhibiting these tendencies.

AN EXAMINATION OF DECEPTIVE SELF-PRESENTATION IN ONLINE

Online dating profiles are a popular new tool for initiating romantic relationships, although recent research suggests that they may also be a fertile ground for deception. The present study examines

Deflecting Threat to One's Image: Dissembling Personal Information as a Self-Presentation Strategy

Theory and research indicate upward comparisons can negatively influence self-evaluation and that people actively employ various protective strategies to mitigate the effect of such comparisons. This

Sex, Lies and fMRI—Gender Differences in Neural Basis of Deception

It is shown that gender differences in the neural processes engaged during falsifying personal information might be independent from socialization.

Lie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars

This study conducted a survey to explore the association between laypeople’s self-reported ability to deceive on the one hand, and their lie prevalence, characteristics, and deception strategies in daily life on the other, and observed that self- reported good liars highly relied on verbal strategies of deception.

Online Deceptive Impression Management: Self-admission and Other Estimates of False Facebook-selves

People deceive online. There is, however, mixed evidence about whether people present themselves falsely on Facebook. We investigated to what extent people present their true selves on Facebook.

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ANALYSING EFFECT OF COMMUNICATION MEDIUM AND MOTIVATION ON DECEPTION DETECTION IN INTERPERSONAL DYADIC INTERACTIONS

This thesis reports an experimental study that examines the role of communication medium and liar motivation on deception detection. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two dyadic
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 17 REFERENCES

Detecting Deception and Judge’s Involvement: Lower Task Involvement Leads to Better Lie Detection

Videotaped samples of target individuals making honest or dishonest statements were shown to 66 male and female participants who judged each sample in terms of honesty. The participants were either

Who lies?

Manipulative people, less highly socialized people, and people with less gratifying same-sex relationships also told especially more self-serving lies, whereas people with higher quality same- sex relationships told relatively more other oriented lies.

Lying in everyday life.

Participants said that they did not regard their lies as serious and did not plan them much or worry about being caught, still, social interactions in which lies were told were less pleasant and less intimate than those in which no lie was told.

Everyday lies in close and casual relationships.

It is predicted and found that participants would tell fewer lies per social interaction to the people to whom they felt closer and would feel more uncomfortable when they did lie to those people, and that lies told to closer partners were more often discovered.

Self-promotion is not ingratiating.

Naive target subjects clearly distinguished between presenters attempting to appear likable or competent and ingratiators using reactive verbal and nonverbal behaviors, whereas promoters used proactive behaviors.

Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †.

The study explores the interaction situation, and considers how within deception interactions differences in neuroanatomy and cultural influences combine to produce specific types of body movements and facial expressions which escape efforts to deceive and emerge as leakage or deception clues.

Gender and relationships. A developmental account.

This article argues that behavioral differentiation of the sexes is minimal when children are observed or tested individually. Sex differences emerge primarily in social situations, and their nature

Friendship and Peer Relations in Children

Attachment, child rearing practices and early relationships social cognition and person perception physical appearance and attractiveness social skills self-disclosure similarity and social

Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy

The bootstrap is extended to other measures of statistical accuracy such as bias and prediction error, and to complicated data structures such as time series, censored data, and regression models.

Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference

PART ONE: INTRODUCTION Traditional Parametric Statistical Inference Bootstrap Statistical Inference Bootstrapping a Regression Model Theoretical Justification The Jackknife Monte Carlo Evaluation of